Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

The Evolution of Silica Nanoparticle-polyester Coatings on Surfaces Exposed to Sunlight
Published on: October 11, 2016
Anti-Corrosion Reinforcements Using Coating Technologies-A Review
Lei Yan1,2, Wenjie Deng3, Neng Wang4
1State Key Laboratory of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China.
This review examines coated reinforcements like galvanized (GRs), epoxy-coated (ECRs), stainless cladding (SCRs), and steel-fiber composite bars (SFCBs) for concrete in harsh environments. Performance varies significantly based on material type and manufacturing, impacting corrosion resistance and bond strength.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Civil Engineering
- Corrosion Engineering
Background:
- Coated reinforcements are crucial for enhancing reinforced concrete durability in aggressive environments.
- Diverse properties of coated reinforcements present challenges for researchers and engineers.
- Understanding material-specific behaviors is key to selecting appropriate anti-corrosion solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the manufacture, corrosion mechanisms, behaviors, and applications of popular coated reinforcements.
- To compare galvanized reinforcements (GRs), epoxy-coated reinforcements (ECRs), stainless cladding reinforcements (SCRs), and steel-fiber reinforced polymer composite bars (SFCBs).
- To highlight performance differences and research/development needs for each type.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of coated reinforcement types.
- Analysis of manufacturing processes and their impact on performance.
- Examination of corrosion mechanisms (oxidation, hydrolysis, under-film corrosion).
- Evaluation of material behaviors, including bond strength and failure modes.
Main Results:
- Galvanized reinforcements (GRs) show controversial performance; epoxy-coated reinforcements (ECRs) have bond strength drawbacks.
- Stainless cladding reinforcements (SCRs) and steel-fiber reinforced polymer composite bars (SFCBs) are primarily affected by coat-core interaction.
- Corrosion mechanisms differ: oxidation for GRs/SCRs, hydrolysis for SFCBs, and under-film for ECRs.
- Corrosion impacts vary: embrittlement for SCRs/bare bars, strength reduction for SFCBs.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing manufacture is critical for GRs and ECRs; cost reduction and capacity increase are needed for SCRs and SFCBs.
- ECRs may lead to premature failure due to under-film corrosion.
- Regional disparities in anti-corrosion reinforcement use correlate with technological and economic development.
- Further research is needed to fully understand and optimize the performance of various coated reinforcements.
Related Concept Videos
Corrosion of Reinforcement
However, over time and under certain conditions like carbonation, chloride ingress, and cracking this protective state can be compromised. Steel has areas with...
Corrosion
Reinforcements in Concrete
Reinforced Brick Masonry
To fortify brick walls...
Waterproofing and Anti-Bacterial Admixtures in Concrete
Waterproofing admixtures render concrete hydrophobic,...
Steel Fastening Techniques
Rivets are cylindrical steel fasteners with a specially designed head. During application, rivets are heated until white-hot and then inserted through pre-drilled holes in the steel sections. A pneumatic hammer is used to shape the exposed end into a second head, securing the sections together.
Bolting is another...

