Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

05:30
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
180
Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
Hsiao-Ting Fu1,2, Hui-Zin Tu3, Herng-Sheng Lee3
1Division of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Tainan Branch, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 11, 2022
Summary
An artificial intelligence (AI) automated system for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis shows improved accuracy and efficiency in identifying acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in smear microscopy. This AI tool enhances laboratory practice by detecting AFB more effectively than manual screening.
Area of Science:
- Medical Diagnostics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Microbiology
Background:
- Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis relies on acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining, which is labor-intensive and has low sensitivity.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential to enhance TB smear microscopy accuracy and efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of an AI-powered automated system for detecting AFB in TB smear microscopy.
- To compare the AI system's diagnostic capabilities against manual screening methods.
Main Methods:
- An AI-based automated system, including a microscopic scanner and recognition program, was used to analyze 5930 TB smears.
- The system detected AFB and classified levels (0-4+), with image analysis per smear varying across stages.
- Performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) were assessed, including analysis after excluding poor-quality smears.
Main Results:
- Initial evaluation showed 91.3% accuracy, 60.0% sensitivity, and 95.7% specificity (120 images/smear).
- Performance improved to 93.7% accuracy, 77.4% sensitivity, and 96.6% specificity (200 images/smear).
- After quality control, accuracy reached 95.2%, sensitivity 85.7%, and specificity 96.9%, with 85 positive smears recovered from initial negative manual screening.
Conclusions:
- The automated TB system demonstrates higher sensitivity and laboratory efficiency compared to manual microscopy, especially with quality-controlled smear preparation.
- AI-driven automated TB smear screening can serve as an effective preliminary screening tool before manual microscopy.

