Defects in sperm capacitation/fertilizing ability are equally prevalent across ages in men seeking fertility...

How do capacitation ability, measured by Cap-Score™, and traditional semen analysis measures (volume, concentration, motility) change with age in men questioning their fertility (MQF)?

Cap-Score and semen analysis measures were obtained from MQF (n = 2652; multicentric design: 35 reproductive endocrinologist prescribers, n = 16 clinics). Morphology was not included due to differences among clinics. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare Cap-Scores between MQF and men with known recent paternity (n = 76). The following age groups were constructed for MQF: 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49 and 50+. Associations between semen analysis, Cap-Score and age groups were evaluated using mixed-model analysis of variance to identify possible influence of Cap-Score collection kit type (n = 763 collected at home; n = 1889 collected at clinics).

MQF had reduced capacitation ability (mean ± SE; 29.25 ± 0.15 versus 35.34 ± 0.88; P < 0.001). No change in Cap-Score (P = 0.916) or concentration (P = 0.926) was detected with age group. In contrast, both volume (P = 0.008) and % motility (P < 0.001) declined with age.

Men presenting because of difficulties in generating pregnancy showed equivalent reductions in capacitation ability regardless of age. In contrast, motility and volume declined with age. These data suggest that capacitation ability is a more sensitive indicator of male fertility across age groups than traditional semen analysis and should not be reserved for older men. Importantly, these data do not address whether sperm fertilizing ability declines in the general population as men age. Instead, they indicate that if men are having difficulty conceiving, no matter what their age, then defects in sperm fertilizing ability are equally likely to be the cause.