Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

179
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
179
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Effort produces after-effects costly for others but valued for self.

eLife·2026
Same author

Time and amount attributes exert distinct neural influences on gain and loss evaluation.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Disentangling Uncertainty Signals in Neural Reward Dynamics.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Distinct cognitive profiles differentiate dementia with lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease.

International psychogeriatrics·2026
Same author

Inefficient integration between effort and reward in anhedonia.

Psychological medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Distinct neural dynamics underlying risk and ambiguity during valued-based decision making.

Leyou Deng1, Qi Li2, Mang Zhang1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Psychophysiology
|November 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals distinct neural dynamics for risk and ambiguity in decision-making. Event-related potentials (ERPs) show that risk and ambiguity are processed differently in the brain during anticipation and outcome phases.

Keywords:
ERPsP3RewPRiskSPNambiguity

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Uncertainty is psychologically and neurobiologically fractioned into risk (known probabilities) and ambiguity (unknown probabilities).
  • Neural mechanisms underlying the dissociation between risk and ambiguity in value-based decision-making remain largely unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural dissociation between risk and ambiguity during value-based decision-making using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To examine how neural dynamics differ in the anticipatory and consummatory phases under risky versus ambiguous conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (N=60) performed a wheel-of-fortune task under either a risky (known probabilities) or ambiguous (unknown probabilities) context.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to analyze neural responses during decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The cue-P3 component was enhanced for risk compared to ambiguity during the anticipatory phase.
  • The RewP component was increased for ambiguity more than risk during the consummatory phase.
  • SPN and fb-P3 components showed modulation by risk and ambiguity levels, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • The findings demonstrate a clear neural dissociation between risk and ambiguity processing.
  • This dissociation unfolds dynamically from the anticipatory to the consummatory phases of decision-making.