Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods

Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods

Direct methods for measuring microbial populations in a culture are essential tools in microbiology, providing quantitative data for various applications. Among these, microscopic counts, plate counts, and serial dilution are widely used techniques, each with unique principles and applications.Microscopic CountsMicroscopic counting involves the use of a Petroff-Hausser chamber, a specialized microscope slide with a grid and defined depth. By observing a liquid culture under a microscope,...

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures

Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures

Microorganisms are routinely cultured in the laboratory using various techniques to isolate, grow, and quantify them for further study. These methods rely on inoculating microorganisms into a suitable growth medium under aseptic conditions to prevent contamination. Depending on the objective, inoculation can involve direct transfer or the use of diluted bacterial suspensions as the inoculum.Streak-Plate Method for IsolationThe streak-plate method is a common technique for obtaining pure...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improved virus inactivation using a hot bubble column evaporator (HBCE).

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2018

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Quantifying Microorganisms at Low Concentrations Using Digital Holographic Microscopy DHM

Quantifying Microorganisms at Low Concentrations Using Digital Holographic Microscopy DHM

Published on: November 1, 2017

Establishing the lower bacterial concentration threshold for different optical counting techniques.

Lamia Sultana¹, Adrian Garrido Sanchis¹

¹School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Northcott Drive, Campbell, Canberra, BC 2610, Australia.

Journal of Microbiological Methods

|November 13, 2022

Summary

This study compares optical and physical methods for detecting E.coli in water. Optical techniques offer rapid, non-destructive analysis but are limited to lower concentrations compared to the traditional plate count method.

Keywords:

Bacterial concentration Escherichia coli Optical measurement Plate-assay method Threshold limit Water quality

More Related Videos

Enhanced Reproducibility and Precision of High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial Growth Data Using a Microplate Reader

Enhanced Reproducibility and Precision of High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial Growth Data Using a Microplate Reader

Published on: July 27, 2022

In Situ Measurement and Correlation of Cell Density and Light Emission of Bioluminescent Bacteria

In Situ Measurement and Correlation of Cell Density and Light Emission of Bioluminescent Bacteria

Published on: June 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Quantifying Microorganisms at Low Concentrations Using Digital Holographic Microscopy DHM

Quantifying Microorganisms at Low Concentrations Using Digital Holographic Microscopy DHM

Published on: November 1, 2017

Enhanced Reproducibility and Precision of High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial Growth Data Using a Microplate Reader

Enhanced Reproducibility and Precision of High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial Growth Data Using a Microplate Reader

Published on: July 27, 2022

In Situ Measurement and Correlation of Cell Density and Light Emission of Bioluminescent Bacteria

In Situ Measurement and Correlation of Cell Density and Light Emission of Bioluminescent Bacteria

Published on: June 28, 2018

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Microbiology
Analytical Chemistry

Background:

Accurate bacterial detection in water is crucial for public health and environmental monitoring.
Traditional methods like the plate count method are reliable but time-consuming.
Rapid and non-destructive methods are needed for efficient water quality analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the efficacy of various optical and physical techniques for detecting E.coli in water.
To establish the detection threshold limits for different optical counting methods.
To evaluate the relationship between colony-forming units (CFU) and sample dilutions.

Main Methods:

Comparison of UV-absorbance spectroscopy, laser particle counting, turbidimetry, Z-Sizer light scattering, and the plate count method.
Measurement of E.coli concentration in tenfold dilutions.
Determination of detection limits and CFU-dilution relationships.

Main Results:

Optical methods provide rapid results (minutes) and are non-destructive with minimal sample preparation.
Optical techniques are effective for E.coli concentrations up to 4 Log E.coli/mL.
The plate count method remains a reliable, though slower (24h), standard for water quality analysis.

Conclusions:

Optical techniques offer a promising, rapid alternative for bacterial water monitoring within certain concentration limits.
The plate count method is still essential for comprehensive water quality assessment due to its reliability.
Further development may enhance the sensitivity and range of optical bacterial detection methods.