Combined use of hyperemic and non-hyperemic pressure ratios for revascularization decision-making: From the ILIAS

Coen K M Boerhout1, Guus A de Waard1, Joo Myung Lee2

  • 1Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Insights

Non-hyperemic Pd/Pa offers prognostic value for coronary artery disease, similar to FFR. Combining both pressure ratios can guide revascularization decisions, improving patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular physiology
  • Interventional cardiology
  • Diagnostic imaging

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease assessment relies on pressure ratios.
  • Non-hyperemic Pd/Pa is a potential diagnostic tool.
  • The ILIAS Registry (NCT04485234) provided data for this study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of non-hyperemic Pd/Pa.
  • Assess the added benefit of combining non-hyperemic Pd/Pa with FFR.
  • Guide revascularization decisions in coronary artery disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 2726 vessels from 2141 patients in a multi-center registry.
  • Classification based on FFR (≤0.80) and non-hyperemic Pd/Pa (≤0.92) values.
  • Primary outcome: target-vessel failure (TVF) at 5-year follow-up.

Main Results:

  • Good correlation between FFR and non-hyperemic Pd/Pa (r=0.73), with 17% discordance.
  • Resting Pd/Pa independently predicted TVF (HR 0.08, p<0.005).
  • Highest TVF risk in vessels with any abnormal pressure ratio where revascularization was deferred.

Conclusions:

  • Abnormal non-hyperemic and hyperemic pressure ratios have significant prognostic value.
  • Combined FFR and non-hyperemic Pd/Pa identify vessels with excellent long-term outcomes.
  • Revascularization decisions may benefit from integrated non-hyperemic and hyperemic pressure ratio assessment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos