Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Should I trust or should I go? How people perceive and assess the quality of science communication to avoid fake news
Andrea Rubin1, Sonia Brondi2, Giuseppe Pellegrini1
1Observa Science in Society, Vicenza, Italy.
Abstract:
This paper investigates how citizens of five European countries (Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, and Spain) enquire about scientific issues, how they rate scientific information on climate change and vaccines in terms of quantity and quality, and their strategies for overcoming perceived defects. We conducted a public consultation involving almost 500 citizens and addressed controversial science-related topics. Discussions were qualitatively content analyzed. The public consultations revealed the prevalence of traditional media as a source of scientific information, and the results presented a general perception of inadequate, imprecise, and insufficient scientific communication. Finally, we show how traditional media are still the most frequently used channels and that personal criteria prevail in the evaluation of the reliability of information sources.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11135-022-01569-5.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Quality of Water
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Ethics in Research
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

