Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
Published on: March 29, 2022
Impact of induced pseudomyopia and refractive fluctuations of accommodative spasm on visual acuity
Navaneetha Ampolu1, Divyank Yarravarapu2, PremNandhini Satgunam3
1Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Clinical Relevance:
High-contrast visual acuity is disproportionately poor in patients with accommodative spasm subtype of near reflex (SNR-A), relative to uncorrected refractive errors of equivalent magnitude. This exaggerated loss of performance in SNR-A may be explained by the combination of pseudomyopia and its fluctuations, vis-à-vis, each factor considered separately.
Background:
To determine how combinations of pseudomyopic refraction and its temporal variations in SNR-A impact high-contrast visual acuity by inducing these patterns in healthy cyclopleged adults, relative to their baseline acuity.
Methods:
Refractive profiles of 15 patients with SNR-A were obtained from a previous study, averaged, and induced before the right eye of 14 cyclopleged adults (mean ±1 SD age: 22.7 ± 2.6 yrs) by feeding the profile into a coaxially placed, motorised, Badal optometer. LogMAR acuity was measured using the method of constant stimuli: (1) before cycloplegia, (2) after cycloplegia and post-cycloplegia with (3) combination of pseudomyopia and its temporal fluctuations, (4) only pseudomyopia, (5) only temporal fluctuations in refraction about emmetropia, (6) condition 5 with double the amplitude of induced fluctuations and (7) condition 5 with half the amplitude of induced fluctuations.
Results:
The induced refractive fluctuations ranged from -0.80 to -1.75D, around a mean pseudomyopia of -1.20D. Visual acuity deterioration was maximum for the combination of pseudomyopia and temporal fluctuations condition (0.51 ± 0.07logMAR), followed by only pseudomyopia (0.27 ± 0.05logMAR) and only refractive fluctuations conditions (0.17 ± 0.04logMAR), all relative to baseline post-cycloplegia (0.13 ± 0.04logMAR) (p < 0.001). Visual acuity loss increased with doubling of refractive fluctuations (0.20 ± 0.04logMAR), relative to native fluctuations or halving the amplitude (0.15 ± 0.03logMAR) (p < 0.01). Task precision, as adjudged from the slope of psychometric function, followed a similar pattern of loss as visual acuity.
Conclusion:
Combination of induced pseudomyopia and temporal fluctuations in refraction produces an additive loss of visual acuity and task precision, relative to baseline and each factor considered separately.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Accessory Structures of the Eye
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...

