Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Real-world ALK Testing Trends in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States
Huamao M Lin1, Yanyu Wu1, Yu Yin1
1Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, MA.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) testing increased in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but did not reach 100%. This means some patients may have missed guideline-recommended biomarker data for treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are key targets in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors offer effective treatment for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.
- Understanding real-world biomarker testing and treatment patterns is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess real-world anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) biomarker testing patterns in US patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- To evaluate treatment strategies employed for NSCLC patients based on ALK rearrangement status.
- To identify trends in ALK testing methods and sample types over time.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of deidentified electronic health records from the Flatiron Health database (2011-2019).
- Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥18 years with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and ≥2 clinic visits.
- Extracted data on ALK testing rates, methods (FISH, NGS), sample types (tissue, blood), and treatment initiation relative to test results.
Main Results:
- Of 60,025 eligible NSCLC patients, 61.1% underwent ALK testing, with 2.8% testing positive (ALK+).
- ALK testing rates rose from 33.1% to 73.0% between 2011 and 2019, with a shift from FISH to next-generation sequencing (NGS).
- Blood sample testing increased significantly, and median time to ALK+ test results was 23 days; 24.7% of ALK+ patients started treatment before receiving results.
Conclusions:
- While ALK testing in NSCLC increased significantly, it remained suboptimal, falling short of 100% coverage.
- Treatment decisions for a notable proportion of NSCLC patients were made without essential biomarker information.
- There is a continued need to improve guideline-recommended biomarker testing rates to ensure appropriate, targeted therapy selection.
More Related Videos
07:42Patient-Derived Tumor Explants As a "Live" Preclinical Platform for Predicting Drug Resistance in Patients
Published on: February 7, 2021
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018