Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Transcatheter heart valve selection in patients with low ejection fraction and aortic stenosis
Ahmad Mustafa1, Chad Kliger2, Luigi Pirelli2
1Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Staten Island University Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Transcatheter heart valve choice in patients with severe aortic stenosis and systolic dysfunction showed similar clinical outcomes. Case-by-case evaluation is recommended for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) device selection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Management of congestive heart failure with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is complex.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a viable treatment for this patient subgroup.
- Limited head-to-head data exists comparing balloon-expandable (BEV) and self-expandable (SEV) transcatheter heart valves (THV) in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes between BEV and SEV THV in patients with severe AS and LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤40%).
- To evaluate the impact of THV choice on clinical endpoints and quality of life.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 335 patients with severe AS and LVEF ≤40% who underwent TAVR at four high-volume centers.
- Patients received either SEV (n=146) or BEV (n=189) THV.
- Primary composite endpoint included in-hospital mortality, moderate/greater paravalvular leak (PVL), stroke, conversion to open surgery, reintervention, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) need.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between SEV and BEV groups.
- Higher rates of PVL observed with SEV, while higher transaortic gradients were noted with BEV.
- Similar clinical outcomes and quality of life measures observed up to 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- THV choice in severe AS with systolic dysfunction does not significantly impact key clinical outcomes at 1 year.
- Consideration of specific valve characteristics, such as PVL and gradients, is important for individualized patient selection.
- Case-by-case decision-making is crucial for optimal TAVR device selection in this challenging patient group.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of transcatheter heart valve (THV) choice in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.
Background:
The management congestive heart failure with combined LV systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, yet transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a suitable treatment option in such patients. Head-to-head comparisons among the balloon-expandable (BEV) and self-expandable (SEV) THV remain limited in this subgroup of patients.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, we included patients with severe AS with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤40%) who underwent TAVR at four high volume centers. Two thousand and twenty-eight consecutive patients were analyzed, of which 335 patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred fourty-six patients (43%) received a SEV, and 189 patients (57%) received a BEV.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar except for a higher proportion of females in the SEV group. The primary composite endpoint of in-hospital mortality, moderate or greater paravalvular (PVL), stroke, conversion to open surgery, aortic valve reintervention, and/or need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) was no different among THV choice. There was more PVL in the SEV group, but higher transaortic gradients in the BEV group. Clinical outcomes and quality of life measures were similar up to 1 year follow-up.
Conclusion:
The choice of THV in patients with severe AS and systolic dysfunction must be weighed on a case-by-case basis.
More Related Videos
12:17Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management