Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Modeling Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease In Vitro by Transfecting Mouse Primary Motoneurons
Published on: January 7, 2019
Virtual Charcot-Marie-Tooth Examination Score: A Validated Virtual Evaluation for People With Charcot-Marie-Tooth
Valeria Prada1, Matilde Laurà1, Riccardo Zuccarino1
1University of Iowa (V.P., M.E.S.), Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; FISM (V.P.), Fondazione italiana Sclerosi Multipla, Genova, Italy; Department of Neuromuscular Diseases (M.L., M.M.R.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom; and Centro Clinico NeMO Trento (R.Z.), Fondazione Serena ONLUS, Pergine Valsugana (Trento), Italy.
Background And Objectives:
The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Examination Score (CMTES) has been used since 2005 in clinics to measure impairment in patients with CMT and has provided natural history data for patients with CMT1A, CMT1B, CMTX1, CMT2A, and many other subtypes. However, the CMTES requires an in-person visit, and many individuals are unable to travel to CMT centers because of the distance from the clinic or physical disability or more recently because of COVID-19 restrictions. We therefore developed the virtual CMTES (vCMTES) as outlined below. The aim of this study is to create a remote clinical outcome assessment to measure impairment in patients with CMT.
Methods:
We modified the CMTESv2 replacing the pinprick and vibration items with light touch and position sense, which can be performed remotely by the patient or the patient with an assistant while being observed by the clinic evaluator. Motor evaluations were performed similar to CMTESv2 by the assistant or the patient, while being observed remotely. We developed a standardized protocol to be used with Zoom or a similar format, a training and certification program, and enabled the vCMTES data to be housed in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium databases. Patients were evaluated in person and remotely for interexaminer and intraexaminer studies.
Results:
Sixty-four patients with genetically confirmed CMT were evaluated by vCMTES and CMTESv2; 53 patients were evaluated virtually 3 weeks after their initial examination. Ten patients were evaluated with the vCMTES by different examiners 5 days apart. CMTESv2 correlates strongly with the vCMTES in person and virtually (p < 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between the vCMTES made in person and virtually (p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained comparing symptoms score items, sensory items, and motor items. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.92.
Discussion:
Statistical analyses demonstrated that the vCMTES was reproducible and reliable as a clinical outcome assessment for CMT. Further studies are needed to test responsiveness to change and progression in different subtypes. The vCMTES also offers the potential to reach diverse populations that do not have access to CMT centers.
More Related Videos
06:35In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of Compound Muscle Action Potential from the Forelimbs in Mouse Models of Motor Neuron Degeneration
Published on: June 15, 2018
08:27Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published on: September 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction