Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping the avoid-ome: a systematic open-science approach to predictive ADMET.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Discovery of 5‑Azaindole Inhibitors of O‑GlcNAcase for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Tauopathies.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2026
Same author

An Automated Workflow for Diagnosing Sampling Issues Caused by Slow Torsional Motions in Molecular Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Developing and Benchmarking Sage 2.3.0 with the AshGC Neural Network Charge Model.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Accurate and robust analysis of molecular kinetics with random features.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Spatially Resolved Hydration Thermodynamics Using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory [Article v1.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2026
Same journal

Structure-Based Experimental Datasets for Benchmarking Protein Simulation Force Fields [Article v1.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2026
Same journal

Running Gaussian-accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations in NAMD [Article v1.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2025
Same journal

Deep Learning for Molecules and Materials.

Living journal of computational molecular science·2023
Same journal

A Suite of Tutorials for the WESTPA 2.0 Rare-Events Sampling Software [Article v2.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2023
Same journal

A Guide to the Continuous Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Methods in Amber and CHARMM [Article v1.0].

Living journal of computational molecular science·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Best practices for constructing, preparing, and evaluating protein-ligand binding affinity benchmarks [Article v0.1].

David F Hahn1, Christopher I Bayly2, Hannah E Bruce Macdonald3,4

  • 1Computational Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, Beerse B-2340, Belgium.

Living Journal of Computational Molecular Science
|November 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized benchmarks and analysis tools are crucial for evaluating free energy calculations in drug discovery. This work introduces guidelines and resources for accurate benchmarking of molecular simulation and machine learning methods.

More Related Videos

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.4K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

464

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.4K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

464

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Molecular modeling

Background:

  • Free energy calculations are vital for structure-enabled drug discovery.
  • Current benchmarking practices lack standardization and suffer from data quality issues.
  • Existing benchmarks may not accurately predict real-world performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish guidelines for creating high-quality, standardized benchmark datasets for evaluating computational methods.
  • To develop best practices for preparing benchmark inputs and analyzing results.
  • To provide a standardized benchmark set (PLBenchmarks) and assessment toolkit (arsenic).

Main Methods:

  • Curating experimental data for benchmark set construction.
  • Developing best practices for benchmark input preparation.
  • Implementing statistically sound analysis of prediction results.
  • Introducing the PLBenchmarks dataset and arsenic toolkit.

Main Results:

  • Guidelines for data curation, input preparation, and analysis are presented.
  • A standardized, curated, and versioned benchmark set (PLBenchmarks) is released.
  • An open-source toolkit (arsenic) for standardized assessments is provided.
  • The work addresses limitations in existing benchmark reports.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized, high-quality benchmarks are essential for reliable assessment of computational methods in drug discovery.
  • The PLBenchmarks set and arsenic toolkit offer a community resource for method evaluation.
  • These guidelines and tools will improve the accuracy and applicability of free energy calculations and machine learning predictions.