Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Standards for Quantitative Metalloproteomic Analysis Using Size Exclusion ICP-MS
Published on: April 13, 2016
Evaluating Mineral Lattices as Evolutionary Proxies for Metalloprotein Evolution
Kenneth N McGuinness1, Gunnar W Klau2, Shaunna M Morrison3
1Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. kenneth.mcguinness@gmail.com.
Iron-sulfur clusters in proteins and minerals show little evolutionary connection. New informatics methods reveal minimal structural similarity, suggesting alternative origins for these vital biological components.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Geochemistry
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Iron-sulfur clusters are crucial for electron transport in metabolic pathways across all life.
- The origin of iron-sulfur cluster incorporation into proteins remains unknown.
- Structural similarities between iron-sulfur minerals and protein clusters suggest a potential co-evolutionary link.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the evolutionary relationship between iron-sulfur protein clusters and iron-sulfide minerals.
- To develop and apply computational methods for comparing finite protein structures with infinite mineral lattices.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Niggli reduction to create finite representations of mineral lattices.
- Represented protein and mineral structures as quotient graphs.
- Developed a graph theory-based method (Maximum Common Connected Edge Subgraph) to quantify structural similarity.
- Employed the Tversky similarity index to account for differences in graph size.
Main Results:
- Found limited structural similarity between ancient iron-sulfur protein clusters and iron-sulfur mineral lattices.
- The computational analysis challenges the hypothesis of direct co-evolution between these protein clusters and minerals.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that iron-sulfur protein clusters and iron-sulfide minerals may not share a direct evolutionary origin.
- Mineral surfaces are proposed as a more plausible proxy for understanding the co-evolution of the geosphere and biosphere.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Ladder Diagrams: Complexation Equilibria
The formation constant, K1, for the formation of Cd(NH3)2+ complex from cadmium and ammonia is 3.55 × 102. Log K1 (i.e. pNH3) is 2.55, and...
Proteomics
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...

