Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

09:19
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
8.8K
Evaluation of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative for Improving Cancer Screening
Rachel Hae-Soo Joung1, Timothy W Mullett2,3, Scott H Kurtzman4,5
1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Network Open
|November 16, 2022
Summary
A quality improvement collaborative successfully restored cancer screening rates, which had declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. This initiative demonstrated significant increases in screening test volumes, addressing critical deficits.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Public Health
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Cancer screening deficits occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and persisted into 2021.
- These deficits may lead to increased cancer-related deaths over the next decade if unaddressed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a nationwide quality improvement (QI) collaborative, named Return-to-Screening, helped restore cancer screening rates.
- To assess the association between participation in the QI collaborative and the recovery of cancer screening volumes.
Main Methods:
- Accredited cancer programs voluntarily joined the QI study.
- QI teams implemented evidence-based interventions from June to November 2021 to meet targets for restoring prepandemic screening volumes.
- Interrupted time series analyses were used to determine the intervention's effect on mean monthly screening test volumes (MTVs).
Main Results:
- Out of 859 QI projects, 79% achieved their target MTVs.
- Interventions led to a significant immediate and sustained increase in MTVs compared to pre-intervention trends.
- Over 170,000 additional screening tests were performed during the intervention period compared to the prepandemic baseline.
Conclusions:
- Participation in the national Return-to-Screening QI collaborative was linked to improved cancer screening rates.
- Multifaceted QI interventions effectively addressed screening deficits.
- Future QI initiatives utilizing accreditation infrastructure could help resolve other cancer care gaps.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
6.3K
Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Some...
6.3K
Nursing Clinical Information System
855
Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
855
Cancer Survival Analysis
418
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
418
Nursing Evaluation
3.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.4K

