Viability droplet digital polymerase chain reaction accurately enumerates probiotics and provides insight into damage

Anthony Kiefer1, Phillip M Byrd1, Peipei Tang1

  • 1IFF Health and Biosciences, Danisco USA, Inc., Madison, WI, United States.

Frontiers in Microbiology
|November 17, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Viability droplet digital PCR (v-ddPCR) offers a more accurate method for enumerating freeze-dried probiotics compared to traditional plate counting. This advanced technique provides better specificity and precision, especially for probiotics stored under stress conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Food Science

Background:

  • Traditional plate counting (PC) for probiotics has limitations in specificity, variability, and enumeration of non-culturable or dead cells.
  • Viability droplet digital PCR (v-ddPCR) is an emerging technique offering improved precision and specificity for cell enumeration, even in complex matrices.
  • Limited research exists on comparing v-ddPCR with PC for enumerating freeze-dried (FD) probiotics during storage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate v-ddPCR using a combination of propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium monoazide (EMA), termed PE51-ddPCR, as an alternative enumeration method for FD probiotics.
  • To assess the performance of PE51-ddPCR against PC over a 3-month accelerated storage study.
  • To investigate the individual contributions of PMA and EMA in v-ddPCR for understanding probiotic viability during storage.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized PE51-ddPCR, combining PMA and EMA, for enumerating blends of four FD probiotic strains.
  • Conducted a 3-month storage study under accelerated conditions.
  • Compared enumeration results from PE51-ddPCR with traditional PC.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated agreement (bias = 7.63e+9, LOA = 4.38e+10 to 5.9e+10) and association (r = 0.762) between PE51-ddPCR and PC, meeting criteria for an accepted alternative method.
  • PE51-ddPCR showed performance at or above the levels of accepted alternative methods.
  • Individual dye analysis (PMA and EMA) provided insights into probiotic physiological states during storage.

Conclusions:

  • PE51-ddPCR is a viable and accurate alternative to PC for enumerating FD probiotics during storage.
  • v-ddPCR with individual dyes offers a more specific physiological understanding of probiotic responses to storage stress.
  • This method enhances the reliability of probiotic enumeration, particularly for products undergoing storage challenges.