Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Construction and assessment of a joint prediction model and nomogram for colorectal cancer
Liming Chen1, Xi Ma1, Huajiang Dong2
1Department of Anorectal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Background:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumors in the digestive system, and all its risk factors are not yet known. It is important to identify valuable clinical indicators to predict the risk of CRC.
Methods:
A total of 227 participants, comprising 162 healthy adults and 65 patients diagnosed with CRC at Tianjin Hospital from January 2017 to March 2022, were included in this study. Electrochemiluminescence was adopted to test the expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA199). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for CRC, and a joint prediction model was then constructed. A nomogram was prepared, and the model was later assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve.
Results:
The univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of smoking (χ2=8.67), fecal occult blood (χ2=119.41), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (χ2=30.87), a history of appendectomy (χ2=5.47), serum total bile acid levels (t=19.80), serum CEA levels (t=37.82), serum CA199 levels (t=6.82), and serum ferritin levels (t=54.31) (all P<0.05). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that smoking, fecal occult blood, H. pylori infection, a history of appendectomy, serum CEA levels, and serum CA199 levels were independent risk factors for CRC (all P<0.05). Based on the above findings, a joint prediction model was constructed, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the model was 0.842. A nomogram and calibration curve was drawn, and the internal validation results indicated that the model had good diagnostic value.
Conclusions:
Smoking, fecal occult blood, H. pylori infection, a history of appendectomy, serum CEA levels, and serum CA199 levels are independent risk factors for CRC, and the prediction model based on these factors had good predictive ability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

