Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Identification of a novel signature with prognostic value in triple-negative breast cancer through
Chao Chen1,2,3, Cai-Jin Lin1,2,3, Si-Yuan Li1,2,3
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Although perceived as a highly aggressive disease, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes heterogeneous features with various outcomes. In this study, we aimed to establish a prognostic signature for patients with TNBC to improve risk stratification.
Methods:
Gene expression data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected pairwise between TNBC and other subtypes of samples. Then, TNBC-correlated modules were determined using coexpression network analysis. A gene signature was established based on the prognostic genes in the intersection between DEGs and selected gene modules using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. Finally, a clinico-transcriptomic signature was developed to predict overall survival (OS). Model performance was quantified, and the bootstrap resampling method was used for validation.
Results:
The gene signature included 6 messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and a clinical score indicating an increased likelihood of death when used as continuous or categorical predictors. A nomogram was built by integrating the pathological stage and gene signature to predict 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS. The addition of pathological stage increased the concordance index (C-index) compared with pathological stage alone and the gene signature alone. Bootstrap resampling revealed a stable performance of the nomogram.
Conclusions:
A 6-mRNA signature was established to inform prognosis for patients with TNBC. Its combination with pathological stage can contribute to improving performance and provide additional supporting evidence for clinical decision-making.

