Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Handling01:02

Sample Handling

134
Transportation of samples from the collection point to the laboratory, as well as storage and preservation techniques, are crucial for maintaining sample integrity and ensuring accurate and reliable test results.
Samples should be transported carefully from collection points to the laboratory. They should be properly sealed and clearly labeled to prevent cross-contamination. To preserve the sample integrity, optimal temperature conditions during transport are essential. This could involve using...
134
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

204
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
204
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.7K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

5.3K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
5.3K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K
Signal Flow Graphs01:18

Signal Flow Graphs

294
Signal-flow graphs offer a streamlined and intuitive approach to representing control systems, providing an alternative to traditional block diagrams. These graphs use branches to symbolize systems and nodes to represent signals, effectively illustrating the relationships and interactions within the system.
In a signal-flow graph, branches denote the system's transfer functions, while nodes represent the signals. The direction of signal flow is indicated by arrows, with the corresponding...
294

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insights into Selenium-Modulated Amino Acids and Carbohydrates as Osmolytes Linked to Photosynthetic Efficiency in Drought-Stressed Edamame.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The Development of the Paraphilic Disorders Short Screen (PDSS) and Its Examination in Diverse Populations: A Large, Multi-Nation Study.

Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment·2026
Same author

Traditional antidiabetic medicinal plants of Himachal Pradesh: ethnomedicinal evidence and drug-discovery potential.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Evidence for temporal-coherence-based segregation of complex auditory scenes in the newborn human brain.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Explainable transfer learning ensemble AI model for lung ultrasound pneumothorax detection with expert benchmark.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

2.0K

Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party?

Orsolya Szalárdy1,2, Brigitta Tóth2, Dávid Farkas2

  • 1Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|November 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The brain segregates multiple background speech streams, processing distractors even when listening to a target speaker. This auditory scene analysis is crucial for understanding speech in noisy environments.

Keywords:
N2P3background segregationspeech processingtarget detection

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K
Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

989

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

2.0K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K
Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

989

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Speech Perception

Background:

  • Humans typically focus on one speaker in noisy environments (cocktail party effect).
  • It remains debated whether background speech is perceived as a single entity or multiple distinct streams.
  • Understanding auditory scene segregation is key to explaining selective listening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate auditory stream segregation by varying the number of concurrent speech streams.
  • To assess how the number of distractors affects target detection and memory.
  • To examine brain activity (event-related potentials) associated with processing target and distractor speech streams.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed target detection and content tracking tasks with varying numbers of speech streams (single, one distractor, two distractors).
  • Behavioral performance was measured.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically N2 and P3 amplitudes, were recorded to analyze neural processing of target and distractor stimuli.

Main Results:

  • N2 amplitude decreased and P3 amplitude increased as the number of concurrent speech streams rose.
  • Distractor processing differed significantly between one- and two-distractor conditions.
  • Neural responses to distractors and syntactic violations in non-target streams were observed, indicating their processing.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the segregation of background speech into distinct auditory streams.
  • The brain actively processes information from non-target speech streams, even when focusing on a single target.
  • This study provides evidence for sophisticated auditory scene analysis in complex listening situations.