Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial

Dimitrios E Magouliotis1, Maria P Fergadi2, Prokopis-Andreas Zotos3

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece. dimitrios.magouliotis.18@ucl.ac.uk.

Insights

Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) significantly improves long-term survival in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients compared to single arterial grafting (SAG). MAG offers better overall and event-free survival, especially for older patients, females, and those with diabetes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) management often involves coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • The choice between single arterial grafting (SAG) and multiple arterial grafting (MAG) impacts long-term patient survival.
  • Optimizing arterial graft selection is crucial for CABG outcomes.

Approach:

  • A comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis were conducted.
  • Original research studies from 1995 to 2022 comparing MAG and SAG for isolated CABG were identified.
  • Long-term overall survival (OS) and event-free OS were primary endpoints, with subgroup analyses for specific patient demographics.

Key Points:

  • MAG demonstrated significantly higher overall survival (HR, 0.589) and event-free survival (HR, 0.828) compared to SAG.
  • The right internal mammary artery (RIMA) showed superior OS compared to the radial artery (RA) as a secondary conduit.
  • MAG benefits were consistent across subgroups, including patients over 70, females, and those with diabetes.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) is associated with enhanced survival outcomes in isolated CABG procedures.
  • The findings support the use of MAG over SAG for improved long-term prognosis in CABG patients.
  • Arterial graft choice, particularly RIMA over RA, influences survival benefits.
Abstract