Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Cell Death Associated with Abnormal Mitosis Observed by Confocal Imaging in Live Cancer Cells
Published on: August 21, 2013
Avelumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The JAVELIN PARP Medley Nonrandomized Controlled
Timothy A Yap1, Aditya Bardia2, Michael Dvorkin3
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Importance:
Preclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have synergistic activity when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, it is unknown which tumor types or molecular subtypes may benefit from this combination.
Objective:
To investigate responses associated with the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in different tumor types and/or molecular subtypes.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
In this phase 1b and 2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the following cohorts: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); DNA damage response (DDR)-positive NSCLC; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)-negative, DDR-positive breast cancer; recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC); recurrent, platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC; urothelial cancer; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); DDR-positive mCRPC; and BRCA1/2- or ATM-altered solid tumors. Data were analyzed between June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021.
Interventions:
All patients in phases 1b and 2 received avelumab plus talazoparib.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The phase 1b primary end point was dose-limiting toxic effects. The phase 2 primary end point was objective response, measured as objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, time to response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression and PSA response of 50% or greater (for mCRPC), cancer antigen 125 response (for OC), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers.
Results:
A total of 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [11.0] years; 117 [52.5%] men) were treated, including 12 patients in phase 1b and 211 patients in phase 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks plus talazoparib 1 mg once daily. In phase 2, the ORR was 18.2% (95% CI, 5.2%-40.3%) in patients with TNBC; 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.1%) in patients with platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC. Responses occurred more frequently in patients with BRCA1/2-altered tumors. Durable responses were observed in patients with TNBC (median [range] DOR, 11.1 [3.4-20.4] months); HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC (median [range] DOR, 15.7 [3.9 to ≥20.6] months); and BRCA1/2-altered OC (median DOR not reached; range, 5.6 to ≥18.4 months). The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were anemia (75 patients [33.6%]), thrombocytopenia (48 patients [21.5%]), and neutropenia (31 patients [13.9%]).
Conclusions And Relevance:
This nonrandomized controlled trial found that ORRs for avelumab plus talazoparib were comparable with those with PARP inhibitor or ICI monotherapy. Prolonged DOR in patients with TNBC; HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and BRCA1/2-altered OC warrant further investigation in randomized clinical trials. These data highlight the importance of prospective patient selection in future studies of ICI and PARP-inhibitor combinations.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330405.
Insights
The combination of avelumab and talazoparib showed promising objective response rates (ORRs) in specific advanced solid tumors, particularly BRCA1/2-altered ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in randomized trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Genomic Medicine
Background:
- Preclinical studies suggest synergistic activity between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
- Optimal patient selection for this combination therapy remains unclear across different tumor types and molecular subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining avelumab (an ICI) with talazoparib (a PARP inhibitor) in patients with various advanced solid tumors.
- To identify specific tumor types and molecular alterations that may benefit from this combination therapy.
Main Methods:
- A phase 1b/2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, urothelial cancer, and prostate cancer.
- Patients received avelumab plus talazoparib, with objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint in phase 2.
- Specific cohorts included DDR-positive and BRCA1/2-altered tumors.
Main Results:
- The objective response rate (ORR) was 18.2% for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 34.8% for HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, DDR-positive breast cancer, and 63.6% for platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered ovarian cancer.
- Durable responses were observed in TNBC, HR-positive/ERBB2-negative/DDR-positive breast cancer, and BRCA1/2-altered ovarian cancer.
- Common grade 3 or greater adverse events included anemia (33.6%), thrombocytopenia (21.5%), and neutropenia (13.9%).
Conclusions:
- The combination of avelumab and talazoparib demonstrated notable objective response rates in select patient populations, including those with BRCA1/2-altered ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer.
- Prolonged duration of response in these subgroups suggests potential clinical benefit, warranting further investigation in randomized trials.
- Prospective patient selection based on molecular characteristics is crucial for future studies evaluating PARP inhibitor and ICI combinations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

