Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

218
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
218
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

106
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
106
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

273
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
273
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

132
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
132
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

85
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
85
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

98
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
98

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Daily Rhythms and Postprandial Responses on the Plasma Metabolome.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cancer Risk: A Matched Cohort Study in China Kadoorie Biobank.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Outcomes reported in studies of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treatments: systematic review.

BJS open·2026
Same author

Body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis (OCTOPUS).

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Plasma protein signatures altered before and after tuberculosis diagnosis in a population-based cohort.

Clinical proteomics·2026
Same author

Companion animal owner "types" identified using a large-scale international assessment of the human-animal bond.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
16:14

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

13.6K

Latent class trajectory modelling: impact of changes in model specification.

Charlotte Watson1,2, Nophar Geifman3, Andrew G Renehan1,2

  • 1Manchester Cancer Research Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre Manchester, UK.

American Journal of Translational Research
|November 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Latent class trajectory models (LCTMs) can identify patient subgroups but may overstate findings. Model choices significantly impact results, necessitating careful validation before clinical use.

Keywords:
Body mass indexcancerlatent variable modellingstatistical learning

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
16:14

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

13.6K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Latent class trajectory models (LCTMs) are increasingly used in medicine and epidemiology to identify clinically meaningful patient subgroups based on longitudinal data.
  • A critical concern is distinguishing true population heterogeneity from spurious associations due to model specification.
  • Over-reliance on goodness-of-fit measures like AIC or BIC may lead to misinterpretation of model results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the sensitivity of longitudinal latent class models to minor specification changes.
  • To illustrate the impact of model specification on the association between identified subgroups and clinical outcomes.
  • To highlight the need for rigorous validation of LCTMs beyond standard goodness-of-fit metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of longitudinal data using latent class trajectory models.
  • Comparison of model outputs (trajectory patterns, outcome probabilities) under different pre-specified shape assumptions (e.g., cubic vs. linear).
  • Evaluation of the influence of model specification choices on the interpretation of subgroup characteristics and clinical relevance.

Main Results:

  • Small modifications in LCTM specification can lead to substantial changes in predicted trajectory patterns and outcome probabilities.
  • Different model specifications (e.g., cubic vs. linear shapes) applied to the same data can yield distinct, yet potentially interpretable, results.
  • Goodness-of-fit statistics alone are insufficient to fully validate a chosen LCTM.

Conclusions:

  • Latent class trajectory models are hypothesis-generating tools and require extensive validation.
  • The choice of model specification significantly influences findings, underscoring the need for sensitivity analyses.
  • LCTMs should not be directly applied in clinical practice without thorough testing and validation to ensure robustness and reliability.