Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A current overview
Hiroshi Ueno1, Teruhiko Imamura1, Shuhei Tanaka1
1Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation patients at high bleeding risk can benefit from left atrial appendage closure. This procedure offers an alternative to oral anticoagulation for preventing stroke and cardioembolic events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia, increasing stroke risk.
- Oral anticoagulation is standard for stroke prevention but carries bleeding risks.
- Some AF patients cannot tolerate long-term anticoagulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate left atrial appendage closure as a non-pharmacological stroke prevention therapy.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure in high-risk AF patients.
- To explore alternatives for patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation.
Main Methods:
- Review of three randomized controlled trials on percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.
- Comparison of WATCHMAN device efficacy and safety against oral anticoagulation.
- Analysis of outcomes including device-related thrombosis and peri-device leakage.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure demonstrated non-inferiority to oral anticoagulation.
- The WATCHMAN FLX device showed improved safety and closure rates.
- Unresolved issues include device thrombosis, antithrombotic therapy, and leakage.
Conclusions:
- Left atrial appendage closure is a promising alternative for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients with high bleeding risk.
- It offers a viable option to avoid cardiac embolism for those with contraindications to anticoagulation.
- Further research is needed to address remaining device-related complications.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and its prevalence increases with age. AF causes palpitations, heart failure, and cardiogenic embolism. Of them, the most critical and fatal complication is a cardio-embolic event. Oral anticoagulation plays a central role in reducing stroke risk in AF patients. Recently, when oral anticoagulation is considered in patients with non-valvular AF who are eligible for direct oral coagulations, they are preferred to vitamin K antagonist based on accumulating evidence. Although many patients can tolerate oral anticoagulation, there is a subset of patients who cannot tolerate long-term oral anticoagulation. Such a subset has a higher bleeding risk as indicated by the HAS-BLED score under oral anticoagulation. This subset of patients requires effective and safe non-pharmacological alternative therapies for stroke prevention. One of the promising non-pharmacological therapies is left atrial appendage closure. Three randomized controlled trials demonstrated non-inferiority of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN family to oral anticoagulation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). WATCHMAN FLX, which was innovated following WATCHMAN 2.5, was associated with fewer safety events and a higher success rate of effective appendage closure. Nevertheless, several unsolved issues remain, including device-related thrombosis, post-treatment antithrombotic therapy, and peri-device leakage. Left atrial appendage closure for patients with non-valvular AF may be an alternative therapy to avoid cardiac embolism for high bleeding risk patients with contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation therapy.

