Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection
Published on: February 12, 2022
Genetic Profiling of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparison Between Double-Expressor Lymphoma and
Haizhu Chen1, Yan Qin1, Peng Liu1
1Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Introduction:
Data are limited regarding the genetic profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins without underlying rearrangements (double-expressor lymphoma [DEL]). This study aimed to describe the genetic profiling and determine the prognostic significance in patients with DEL and in those with non-DEL.
Methods:
Capture-based targeted sequencing was performed on 244 patients with de novo DLBCL, not otherwise specified. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed for evaluating the MYC and BCL2 expression.
Results:
Among 244 patients, 46 patients had DEL, and 198 had non-DEL. KMT2D, CD58, EP300, PRDM1, TNFAIP3 and BCL2 gain or amplification (BCL2GA/AMP) were significantly more frequently altered in the DEL group. Alterations in the BCR/TLR (p = 0.021), B-cell development and differentiation (p = 0.004), and NF-κB (p = 0.034) pathways occurred more frequently in patients with DEL. Thirty-seven DEL patients and 132 non-DEL patients were included for survival analyses. DEL was not significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.60) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.49). In DEL patients, after adjusting for the International Prognostic Index, BCL2 alteration (HR 2.516, 95% CI 1.027-6.161; p = 0.044) remained an independent predictor of inferior PFS. BCL2GA/AMP also predicted poor PFS, but with marginal statistical significance (HR 2.489, 95% CI 0.995-6.224; p = 0.051).
Conclusion:
There was difference in profiling of altered genes and signaling pathways between the DEL group and the non-DEL group. The presence of DEL alone should not be considered as an adverse prognostic indicator, and BCL2 alteration could define a subset of patients with poor prognosis within DEL.
More Related Videos
10:18From a 2DE-Gel Spot to Protein Function: Lesson Learned From HS1 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published on: October 19, 2014
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023