Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.0K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.0K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

13.1K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.1K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

3.2K
3.2K
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

929
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
929
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clocked stepping of an artificial protein walker along a DNA track.

Nature nanotechnology·2026
Same author

Customizing the structure of minimal TIM barrels to craft efficient de novo enzymes.

Nature chemical biology·2026
Same author

Optimizing Stability in Dynamic Small-Molecule Binding Proteins.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

The Key to Enzymatic Degradation of Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT): Influence of Semicrystalline Properties on Degradation.

ChemSusChem·2025
Same author

The 76th Mosbacher Colloquium: AI-driven (r)evolution in structural biology and protein design.

Biological chemistry·2025
Same author

A third type of PETase from the marine Halopseudomonas lineage.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.4K

PocketOptimizer 2.0: A modular framework for computer-aided ligand-binding design.

Jakob Noske1, Josef Paul Kynast1, Dominik Lemm1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.

Protein Science : a Publication of the Protein Society
|November 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

PocketOptimizer 2.0 enhances computational protein design for creating specific small molecule binders. This improved pipeline offers better accuracy and versatility for biotechnological applications.

More Related Videos

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

461
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

270

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.4K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

461
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

270

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Designing proteins for specific tasks, especially small molecule binding, is crucial for biotech and biomedical fields.
  • Computational methods aid in navigating protein design complexity, but require accurate modeling and energy evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present PocketOptimizer 2.0, an advanced computational pipeline for designing protein binding pockets.
  • To improve prediction accuracy and provide a versatile tool for protein design.

Main Methods:

  • PocketOptimizer 2.0 is a modular pipeline predicting mutations in protein binding pockets.
  • It features an improved architecture, user interface, backbone-dependent rotamer library, and refined algorithms.
  • The pipeline allows comparison of various force fields, rotamer libraries, and scoring functions.

Main Results:

  • Version 2.0 demonstrated improved prediction accuracy compared to the first version, particularly with the new rotamer library.
  • The enhanced functionalities provide a robust and versatile environment for designing small molecule-binding pockets.

Conclusions:

  • PocketOptimizer 2.0 offers a powerful, modular, and extensible platform for computational protein design.
  • Its improvements facilitate the creation of sensitive and specific ligand-binding proteins for diverse applications.