Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.2K
Organizational Social Relations and Social Embedding: A Pluralistic Review
Audrey-Anne Cyr1, Isabelle Le Breton-Miller1, Danny Miller1
1HEC Montréal.
Summary
This study organizes the literature on organizational social relationships, identifying three dominant perspectives: economic, organizational, and interactionist. These frameworks offer diverse insights into social dynamics within organizations.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Studies
- Sociology
- Management Science
Background:
- Extensive literature exists on social relationships in organizations, but lacks systematic organization.
- Multiple disciplines and theoretical lenses contribute diverse assumptions and priorities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically organize the literature on processes and mechanisms shaping social relationships in and around organizations.
- To identify dominant perspectives and their characteristics within this literature.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 372 studies from the literature on organizational social relationships.
- Identification and categorization of assumptions, priorities, and relational issues.
- Thematic analysis to surface dominant theoretical perspectives.
Main Results:
- Three dominant perspectives were identified: economic, organizational, and interactionist.
- Each perspective exhibits distinct ontologies of social relations, actors, processes, and embedding.
- A wide spectrum of relational issues and causal patterns emerged across disciplines.
Conclusions:
- The identified perspectives offer a richer characterization of social relations in organizational contexts.
- Opportunities for further research exist within each perspective.
- Recognizing the pluralistic nature of social relations can inform targeted relational paradigms for different organizational contexts and problems.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
39.3K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.3K
Social Traps
22.6K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.6K
Social Proof
27.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.9K
Humanistic Psychology
1.2K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
1.2K
Social Exchange Theory
34.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.8K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K

