Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Alternative Method of Removing Otoliths from Sturgeon
Published on: June 27, 2016
A solution in search of a problem: Commentary on O'Donohue and Fisher (2022)
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Metropolitan State University of Denver.
Abstract:
O'Donohue and Fisher (2022) make some good arguments about how free speech has been jeopardized in recent years, but few if any of those arguments concern psychologists directly. Furthermore, because free speech is codified in the First Amendment, it is unclear why or how its inclusion in the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (American Psychological Association, 2017), would add anything meaningful. The arguments posed by O'Donohue and Fisher are far ranging but seldom specific to the work of psychologists. While the additional language on free speech might be well suited for the Ethics Code's aspirational principles, the proposed amendment is neither suitable nor necessary within the enforceable standards. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
Frames: Problem Solving I
Frames: Problem Solving II
Impact: Problem Solving
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
Castigliano's Theorem: Problem Solving

