Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

21.7K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
21.7K
Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

48.4K
Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break...
48.4K
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States03:25

Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

11.6K
The free energy change for a process taking place with reactants and products present under nonstandard conditions (pressures other than 1 bar; concentrations other than 1 M) is related to the standard free energy change according to this equation:
 
where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/K·mol), T is the absolute temperature in kelvin, and Q is the reaction quotient. This equation may be used to predict the spontaneity of a process under any given set of conditions.
Reaction Quotient...
11.6K
Gibbs Free Energy02:39

Gibbs Free Energy

33.9K
One of the challenges of using the second law of thermodynamics to determine if a process is spontaneous is that it requires measurements of the entropy change for the system and the entropy change for the surroundings. An alternative approach involving a new thermodynamic property defined in terms of system properties only was introduced in the late nineteenth century by American mathematician Josiah Willard Gibbs. This new property is called the Gibbs free energy (G) (or simply the free...
33.9K
Free Energy and Equilibrium00:55

Free Energy and Equilibrium

6.4K
The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔG is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
The reaction quotient, Q, is a convenient measure of the...
6.4K
Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability02:23

Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability

6.9K
The spontaneity of a process depends upon the temperature of the system. Phase transitions, for example, will proceed spontaneously in one direction or the other depending upon the temperature of the substance in question. Likewise, some chemical reactions can also exhibit temperature-dependent spontaneities. To illustrate this concept, the equation relating free energy change to the enthalpy and entropy changes for the process is considered:
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Good Practices for Simulation Studies Published in <i>The Journal of Physical Chemistry B</i>.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Convergence is not correctness: context-dependent performance of enhanced-sampling methods across biological complexity.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Aromatic ring flips reveal reshaping of protein dynamics in crystals and complexes.

Nature chemistry·2026
Same author

Predicting Positive Surgical Margins in Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning Models.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same author

Global research trends in single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a visualization-based bibliometric analysis.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Free-Energy Landscapes of HBV Hexamer Closure Reveal Key Structural Features of the Transition.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Tomogram exploration through template matching and deep learning.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

A comparative review of cryo-electron ptychography: Biological applications and future perspectives.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

12.9K

Enhancing sampling with free-energy calculations.

Haochuan Chen1, Christophe Chipot2

  • 1Laboratoire International Associé Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Unité Mixte de Recherche n°7019, Université de Lorraine, B.P. 70239, 54506, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France.

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|November 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New computational methods enhance sampling for biomolecular simulations, enabling the study of rare events like protein-ligand binding and conformational changes. These techniques improve free-energy calculations for complex biological questions.

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

12.9K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Molecular Dynamics

Background:

  • Traditional brute-force simulations struggle with complex biological events such as biomolecular conformational transitions and protein-ligand binding.
  • Advancements in computational methods are crucial for exploring rare events and performing reliable free-energy calculations.
  • The proliferation of new, related methods complicates the selection of the most appropriate technique for specific research problems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize geometrical transformations and algorithms for enhanced sampling in molecular simulations.
  • To elucidate the theoretical underpinnings of these advanced sampling methods.
  • To demonstrate the interconnectedness and potential for combining these algorithms for superior performance.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on geometrical transformations and algorithms designed to improve sampling efficiency.
  • Analysis of methods that enhance exploration along chosen progress variables.
  • Tracing the theoretical foundations and relationships between different sampling enhancement techniques.

Main Results:

  • Significant progress in enhancing sampling for complex biomolecular systems.
  • Development of a diverse palette of methods for exploring rare events.
  • Identification of connections and synergies between various sampling enhancement algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • Geometrical transformations and algorithms offer powerful tools for tackling previously intractable problems in computational biology.
  • Understanding the theoretical basis and interrelations of these methods facilitates their effective application and combination.
  • These advancements are critical for addressing key biological questions through reliable free-energy calculations and improved simulation performance.