Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
Published on: August 11, 2023
DECT Numbers in Upper Abdominal Organs for Differential Diagnosis: A Feasibility Study
Fumihito Toshima1, Norihide Yoneda1, Kanako Terada1
1Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1, Takara-Machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Ishikawa, Japan.
Dual-energy CT (DECT) numbers can assess lesion similarity. This study found minimal DECT number variation within organs, suggesting it can help differentiate lesions using quantitative imaging analysis.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Quantitative Imaging
Background:
- Assessing similarity between primary and metastatic lesions using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) numbers is valuable.
- Current criteria for DECT number similarity are unclear, hindering clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate DECT number variations within upper abdominal organs.
- To establish standards for DECT number similarity based on intra-organ variability.
- To evaluate DECT parameters for distinguishing between organs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of hepatic protocol DECT scans from 30 patients.
- Collection of DECT numbers for 70 keV, 40 keV CT values, slope, effective Z, iodine, and water concentration.
- Assessment of DECT number agreement within the liver, spleen, and kidney using Bland-Altman analysis.
- Evaluation of diagnostic ability using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Main Results:
- Narrowest 95% limits of agreement within the same organ were observed on delayed phase (DP) CT for slope, effective Z, iodine, and water concentration.
- High diagnostic ability was achieved using DECT number differences on portal venous (PVP) and DP images (AUC of DP: 0.987-0.999).
Conclusions:
- Intra-organ DECT number variability can serve as a criterion for similarity.
- This approach may aid in differential diagnosis by comparing DECT numbers of different entities.
- Quantitative DECT analysis offers potential for improved lesion characterization.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Abdominal Regions and Quadrants
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...

