An initiative for a more inclusive working life and its effect on return-to-work after sickness absence: a multistate
Rune Hoff1, Niklas Maltzahn2,3, Rachel Louise Hasting4
1Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway rune.hoff@medisin.uio.no.
Objectives:
To reduce sickness absence (SA) and increase work participation, the tripartite Agreement for a More Inclusive Working Life (IA) was established in Norway in 2001. IA companies have had access to several measures to prevent and reduce SA. Our aim in this paper was to estimate the average effect of having access to IA at the time of entering a first SA on later return-to-work (RTW) and on time spent in other work-related states. A secondary objective was to study how effects varied between women and men, and individuals with SA due to either musculoskeletal or psychological diagnoses.
Design:
Population-based observational multistate longitudinal cohort study.
Setting:
Individual characteristics and detailed longitudinal records of SA, work and education between 1997-2011 were obtained from population-wide registries.
Participants:
Each individual born in Norway 1967-1976 who entered full-time SA during 2004-2011, with limited earlier SA, was included (n=187 930).
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures:
Individual multistate histories containing dated periods of work, graded SA, full-time SA, non-employment and education.
Methods:
Data were analysed in a multistate model with 500 days of follow-up. The effect of IA was assessed by estimating differences in state probabilities over time, adjusted for confounders, using inverse probability weighting.
Results:
IA increased the probability of work after SA, with the largest difference between groups after 29 days (3.4 percentage points higher (95% CI 2.5 to 4.3)). Differences in 1-year expected length of stay were 8.4 additional days (4.9 to 11.9) in work, 7.6 (4.8 to 10.3) fewer days in full-time SA and 1.6 (-0.2 to 3.4) fewer days in non-employment. Similar trends were found within subgroups by sex, musculoskeletal and psychological diagnoses. The robustness of the findings was studied in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion:
Measures to prevent and reduce SA, as given through IA, were found to improve individuals' RTW after entering SA.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
