Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

Bioequivalence: Overview

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...

Observational Studies

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Developing a fully automated imaging biomarker for HCC risk assessment via MRI-based tumor segmentation and EPM.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Same author

Understanding vascular imaging history guides our future innovations.

Journal of vascular surgery·2025

Same author

Spontaneous celiac artery aneurysms in 13-year-old and 10-year-old brothers with <i>PLOD1</i>-related kyphoscoliotic Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques·2024

Same author

Management of Rib Fractures in the Combat Environment.

Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals·2024

Same author

How I treat nutcracker syndrome.

Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Systematic and scoping reviews: A comparison and overview.

Shane A Smith¹, Audra A Duncan¹

¹Division of Vascular Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Seminars in Vascular Surgery

|November 22, 2022

Summary

This article compares literature review methods like systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Understanding these approaches is crucial for evidence-based medicine and guiding future research effectively.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Medical Literature Synthesis
Evidence-Based Medicine Methodologies

Background:

The exponential growth of medical literature necessitates efficient review methods.
Review articles are vital for researchers navigating vast amounts of information.
Evidence-based medicine demands systematic approaches to literature evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare and contrast different literature review methodologies.
To elucidate the distinct applications of systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews.
To provide guidance on selecting appropriate review methods for research and practice.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and narrative reviews.
Explanation of the formalized approach of systematic reviews using the PICO format.
Description of the broader scope and flexibility of scoping reviews.
Discussion of the role of traditional narrative reviews.

Main Results:

Systematic reviews offer a formalized, bias-minimizing approach for specific clinical questions (PICO).
Scoping reviews systematically assess the breadth and depth of knowledge on a topic, with less constrained a priori decisions.
Narrative reviews remain valuable for informing practice and research when high-quality evidence is scarce.

Conclusions:

Each review type serves distinct purposes in synthesizing medical literature.
Systematic reviews are best for narrow, PICO-defined questions.
Scoping reviews are useful for mapping a field or as a precursor to systematic reviews.
Narrative reviews retain importance for exploratory or evidence-limited areas.