Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Assessing Intertidal Populations of the Invasive European Green Crab
Published on: September 16, 2020
Has the IPCC's revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
Ronald C Estoque1,2, Asif Ishtiaque3, Jagadish Parajuli4
1Center for Biodiversity and Climate Change, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan. estoquerc21@affrc.go.jp.
Abstract:
In the Third and Fourth Assessment Reports (TAR and AR4, respectively) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), vulnerability is conceived as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. However, in its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) and Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), the IPCC redefined and separated exposure, and it reconceptualized vulnerability to be a function of sensitivity and capacity to cope and adapt. In this review, we found that the IPCC's revised vulnerability concept has not been well adopted and that researchers' preference, possible misinterpretation, possible confusion, and possible unawareness are among the possible technical and practical reasons. Among the issues that need further clarification from the IPCC is whether or not such a reconceptualization of vulnerability in the SREX/AR5 necessarily implies nullification of the TAR/AR4 vulnerability concept as far as the IPCC is concerned.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Global Climate Change
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
What is Climate?
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Responses to Drought and Flooding

