Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.6K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.9K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

141
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
141
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

64
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
64
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

146
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
146
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prioritizing Work or Family? Investigating Women's and Men's Work-Family Decisions.

Sex roles·2026
Same author

Decolonizing Interventions for Workplace Gender Equity: An Intersectional and Latin American Lens.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2025
Same author

From Privilege to Threat: Unraveling Psychological Pathways to the Manosphere.

Archives of sexual behavior·2025
Same author

The strategic use of harm-based moral arguments in the context of women's bodily autonomy.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment.

Journal of management·2024
Same author

The Impact of Motherhood on Women's Career Progression: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Interventions.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K

Addressing workplace gender inequality: Using the evidence to avoid common pitfalls.

Michelle K Ryan1,2

  • 1Global Institute for Women's Leadership, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

The British Journal of Social Psychology
|November 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Workplace gender equality initiatives often fail due to common missteps. Addressing systemic issues and recognizing intersectionality are crucial for effective progress, moving beyond mere data description or focusing solely on women.

Keywords:
gender differencesgender equalityglass cliffintersectionalityrisk-taking

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

874

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

874

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Gender Studies

Background:

  • Workplace gender equality initiatives are widespread but face persistent challenges.
  • Common approaches often fall short of achieving meaningful, sustainable change.
  • A critical review of existing strategies is needed to identify and rectify common errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze four prevalent missteps in designing and implementing workplace gender equality initiatives.
  • To propose alternative, research-backed strategies for more effective gender equality programs.
  • To highlight the importance of systemic change and intersectionality in achieving gender parity.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines common pitfalls through a critical review of current practices.
  • It draws upon existing research to suggest improved approaches.
  • The article focuses on conceptual analysis and the presentation of evidence-based recommendations.

Main Results:

  • Four key missteps are identified: focusing solely on numbers, attempting to 'fix' women instead of systems, premature optimism about progress, and neglecting intersectionality.
  • Research suggests that systemic interventions are more effective than individual-focused solutions.
  • Acknowledging the diverse experiences of women, particularly considering intersectionality, is vital for inclusive initiatives.

Conclusions:

  • Effective workplace gender equality requires moving beyond superficial metrics and addressing underlying systemic barriers.
  • Initiatives must be designed with an understanding of intersectionality to support all women.
  • A shift towards systemic change and realistic progress assessment is essential for advancing gender equality.