Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

248
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
248
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

141
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
141
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Sheep Placenta in the Treatment of Skin Disorders.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Low-Temperature Deposition of Polycrystalline ε-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> for Deep Ultraviolet Perceptual Photodetection.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Genomic analysis of <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> causing postharvest strawberry rot and the control effect of pydiflumetofen.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Nonlinear Modeling Reveals Novel Associations Between Genetically Predicted Protein Levels and Pancreatic Cancer Risk.

Molecular carcinogenesis·2026
Same author

The impact of trust in AI on digital innovation examining the moderation of intellectual capital and task characteristics.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Efficient targeted learning of heterogeneous treatment effects for multiple subgroups.

Waverly Wei1, Maya Petersen1, Mark J van der Laan1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

Biometrics
|November 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel, model-free method for analyzing treatment effect heterogeneity in personalized medicine. The approach efficiently estimates effects across multiple subgroups, outperforming traditional methods in simulations.

Keywords:
causal inferenceprecision medicinesemiparametric statisticssubgroup analysistreatment effect heterogeneity

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Statistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Personalized medicine relies on understanding treatment effect heterogeneity.
  • Conventional methods using parametric modeling are prone to mis-specification.
  • Estimating treatment effects in subgroups is crucial for tailored medical interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a model-free semiparametric approach for evaluating heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • To simultaneously assess treatment effects across multiple clinically relevant subgroups.
  • To enhance personalized medicine strategies through precise subgroup analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the one-step targeted maximum-likelihood estimation (TMLE) framework.
  • Developed a variation of one-step TMLE robust to small propensity scores for large subgroup numbers.
  • Employed a semiparametric, model-free perspective for analysis.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated substantial finite sample improvements over conventional techniques.
  • Successfully identified potential treatment effect heterogeneity in a case study.
  • The method efficiently evaluated heterogeneous treatment effects across multiple subgroups.

Conclusions:

  • The novel TMLE-based approach offers an efficient and robust way to analyze treatment effect heterogeneity.
  • This method advances personalized medicine by enabling better prediction of treatment benefits in specific patient subpopulations.
  • The findings highlight the importance of model-free methods in biomedical research for accurate treatment effect estimation.