Quantifying deep neural network uncertainty for atrial fibrillation detection with limited labels

Brian Chen1, Golara Javadi2, Alexander Hamilton1

  • 1School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Scientific Reports
|November 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a method to improve the automated detection of atrial fibrillation using deep learning models trained on limited, noisy intensive care unit data. By using a surrogate model to generate weak labels and incorporating uncertainty estimation, the researchers achieved better classification accuracy and more reliable predictions without requiring extensive manual data labeling.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
670
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
685
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.3K