Introducing new plan evaluation indices for prostate dose painting IMRT plans based on apparent diffusion coefficient
Saman Moradi1, Bijan Hashemi2, Mohsen Bakhshandeh3
1Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116, Iran.
New indices for Intensity-Optimized Evaluation (IOE) improve prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) dose painting plans. Considering cellular density in IOE homogeneity and omitting it in IOE conformity optimizes treatment evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Image-guided Therapy
Background:
- Conventional plan quality indices are insufficient for complex prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) dose painting due to varied dose prescriptions.
- Evaluating dose distribution conformity and homogeneity requires advanced metrics that account for tumoral cell density and lesion volume variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce novel Intensity-Optimized Evaluation (IOE) indices for assessing dose distribution conformity and homogeneity in prostate IMRT dose painting.
- To evaluate these new indices by comparing them with conventional methods and assessing their correlation with tumor control probability (TCP).
Main Methods:
- CT and MRI scans from 20 prostate cancer patients were used for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) dose painting planning.
- Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images were utilized to automatically delineate tumor sub-volumes (CTV70Gy, CTV60Gy, CTV53Gy) based on ADC values.
- New homogeneity (IOE(H)) and conformity (IOE(C)) indices were developed, incorporating relative lesion volume and cellular density from ADC data, and compared against conventional metrics and TCP.
Main Results:
- The novel IOE indices, particularly IOE(H) considering cellular density, showed significantly lower values compared to conventional indices (P < 0.05).
- Tumor control probability (TCP) demonstrated a stronger relationship with IOE(H) incorporating cell density (R² = -0.415) and IOE(C) without cell density (R² = 0.624).
Conclusions:
- The proposed IOE plan evaluation indices are effective for assessing prostate IMRT dose painting plans.
- Incorporating cellular density into the IOE(H) calculation is recommended, while IOE(C) is best calculated without considering cellular density.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
