Simulation and Validation of Optimized PID Controller in AGV (Automated Guided Vehicles) Model Using PSO and BAS
Ata Jahangir Moshayedi1, Jinsong Li2, Nima Sina3
1School of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, No. 86, Hongqi Ave, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
|November 24, 2022
Summary
This study compares PID controller tuning methods for automated guided vehicles (AGVs) using MATLAB and CoppeliaSim simulations. Beetle Antennae Searching (BAS) proved fastest, while Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) offered better overall performance for AGV path tracking.
Area of Science:
- Robotics and Automation
- Control Systems Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) are integral to modern industry, logistics, and healthcare, with performance heavily reliant on control strategies.
- Optimizing AGV control requires accurate modeling and simulation to evaluate different tuning techniques.
- Existing research explores various approaches to AGV control, highlighting the need for comparative analysis of tuning methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the components and data of an actual AGV system for simulation.
- To compare four PID controller tuning methods—Ziegler Nichols, empirical, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Beetle Antennae Searching (BAS)—for AGV path tracking.
- To validate simulation results in a realistic robotics simulator (CoppeliaSim).
Main Methods:
- System modeling and simulation of an AGV in MATLAB.
- PID controller tuning using Ziegler Nichols, empirical, PSO, and BAS methods.
- Comparative analysis of controller performance across circular, elliptical, spiral, and 8-shaped paths in both MATLAB and CoppeliaSim.
Main Results:
- BAS algorithm demonstrated the fastest execution, while PSO exhibited superior overall performance.
- Empirical, PSO, and BAS methods yielded comparable error margins.
- Path complexity influenced error, with 8-shaped paths showing maximum error and circular paths the minimum.
- Simulation results across MATLAB and CoppeliaSim were consistent.
Conclusions:
- The study validates the effectiveness of PID controller tuning methods, particularly BAS and PSO, for AGV path tracking.
- Simulation-based PID coefficient extraction shows promise for real-world AGV applications, despite environmental constraints.
- The findings provide valuable insights for robotic researchers seeking to improve AGV control strategies.
Related Concept Videos
PID Controller
194
Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are widely used in various control systems to enhance stability and performance. In a thermostat, it adjusts heating or cooling based on the temperature difference between the actual and desired levels. They are often used in automotive speed systems, effectively managing sudden speed changes while maintaining a constant speed under varying conditions. On the other hand, PI controllers, commonly employed in voltage regulation, enhance stability...
194
PD Controller: Design
316
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
316
PI Controller: Design
424
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
424
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
165
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
165
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control
182
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
182
Open and closed-loop control systems
910
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
910


