Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

210
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
210
What is Variation?01:14

What is Variation?

12.7K
Apart from the measures of central tendency, distribution, outliers, and the changing characteristics of data with time, an important characteristic of any data set is its variation or spread. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in others, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean.
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
12.7K
Variation01:19

Variation

7.2K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.2K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.9K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.9K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

177
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
177
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of age partitioning on classification discordance in pediatric ferritin reference intervals.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

An improved approach to modelling patient reclassification: HbA<sub>1c</sub> as an example.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Data-driven age partitioning for pediatric serum copper: implications for reference interval interpretation.

Practical laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Challenges in Using Clinical Data for AI-Enabled Diagnostic Support.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With HbA<sub>1c</sub> to Improve the Detection of Prediabetes in Asian Individuals: Model Development Study.

JMIR diabetes·2026
Same author

Improving clinical interpretation of serum alpha-fetoprotein in children: using continuous and discrete reference intervals.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Evaporation-reducing Culture Condition Increases the Reproducibility of Multicellular Spheroid Formation in Microtiter Plates
11:24

Evaporation-reducing Culture Condition Increases the Reproducibility of Multicellular Spheroid Formation in Microtiter Plates

Published on: March 7, 2017

7.1K

Lot-to-lot variation and verification.

Tze Ping Loh1, Corey Markus2, Chin Hon Tan3

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|November 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Lot-to-lot verification ensures measurement stability but faces challenges in experimental design and resources. Collaborative efforts and manufacturer transparency are key to improving reagent lot performance and patient safety.

Keywords:
between-reagent lotbiasdriftimprecisionlot-to-lot variationlot-to-lot verificationreagent lotshift

More Related Videos

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.3K
Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

42.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Evaporation-reducing Culture Condition Increases the Reproducibility of Multicellular Spheroid Formation in Microtiter Plates
11:24

Evaporation-reducing Culture Condition Increases the Reproducibility of Multicellular Spheroid Formation in Microtiter Plates

Published on: March 7, 2017

7.1K
Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.3K
Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

42.9K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Measurement Procedures

Background:

  • Lot-to-lot verification is crucial for monitoring long-term measurement procedure stability.
  • Current practices face challenges related to resource demands, experimental design, and statistical analysis.
  • Increasingly available guidance aims to address these complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of lot-to-lot verification in laboratory medicine.
  • To discuss challenges and propose solutions for effective lot-to-lot verification.
  • To emphasize the need for collaboration among stakeholders to ensure reagent lot quality and patient safety.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of current challenges in lot-to-lot verification.
  • Exploration of collaborative verification and patient-based monitoring strategies.
  • Analysis of the role of manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and professional organizations.

Main Results:

  • Collaborative efforts and patient-based monitoring can improve timely identification of performance differences.
  • Appropriate follow-up actions for failed verification are necessary to balance clinical service disruption.
  • Increased transparency from manufacturers regarding release criteria is needed.

Conclusions:

  • A tripartite collaboration between regulatory bodies, manufacturers, and laboratory professionals is essential.
  • This collaboration will help balance regulatory, manufacturing, and clinical requirements.
  • Minimizing reagent lot differences is critical for ensuring patient safety and reliable laboratory testing.