Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

9.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
9.1K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

54.1K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
54.1K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

54.4K
Overview
54.4K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

58.1K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
58.1K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

146
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
146

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevention of Heart Failure in Women: An Expert Consensus Statement on Sex-Specific Risk Factors.

European journal of heart failure·2026
Same author

European society of gynecology (ESG) position paper on the proposed terminology change from PCOS to PMOS.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology·2026
Same author

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, web-based counseling, and online/digital psychoeducation for male sexual dysfunction: a systematic review.

Sexual medicine reviews·2026
Same author

Expert Opinion on Age-Related Sex Hormone Changes and Hypogonadism in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Delphi Consensus Program.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2026
Same author

A multimodal intervention program to improve sexual health and self-perceived quality of life in patients treated for cervical cancer: a randomized prospective study (PROVIDENCE trial).

Journal of gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

POESIT recommendations on management of body-identical hormones in menopausal symptoms.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2024
Same journal

The International Menopause Society celebrates another milestone.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
Same journal

Impact of social determinants of health on perimenopause symptom burden: insights from the Flo app.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
Same journal

From tissue to outcome - how perioperative vaginal estrogen transforms prolapse surgery results: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical evidence and outcomes.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
Same journal

Mapping menopause education for healthcare professionals: a scoping review.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
Same journal

Portuguese osteopaths' perceptions on the management of musculoskeletal conditions in menopausal women.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
Same journal

Perimenopausal migraine: a narrative review.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.6K

Peer review? No thanks!

C Castelo-Branco1

  • 1Hospital Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Climacteric : the Journal of the International Menopause Society
|November 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific peer review is essential for validating research. This process involves authors, editors, and reviewers working together to improve manuscripts and ensure accurate scientific publication.

Keywords:
Peer-reviewauthorseditorsmanuscriptreviewerscientific journal

More Related Videos

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

721
Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.6K
Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

721
Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • The peer review process is a cornerstone of modern scientific communication.
  • It involves critical evaluation of submitted manuscripts by experts in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the essential role of peer review in scientific publishing.
  • To emphasize the collaborative nature of the process involving authors, editors, and reviewers.
  • To underscore the goal of improving manuscript quality and promoting accurate scientific knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract describes the peer review process conceptually.
  • It outlines the roles of authors, editors, and reviewers.
  • It uses a metaphor of a hurdle race to illustrate the process.

Main Results:

  • The peer review process is fundamental for scientific advancement.
  • It facilitates the improvement of research papers through expert feedback.
  • Successful peer review leads to the publication of reliable scientific findings.

Conclusions:

  • The peer review system is indispensable for maintaining scientific rigor.
  • Respecting the time and effort of all participants is crucial for effective peer review.
  • The process ultimately serves to advance accurate and innovative scientific knowledge.