Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Diastolic versus Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction as Independent Predictors for Unfavorable Postoperative
Luminita Iliuta1,2, Andreea Gabriella Andronesi3,4, Camelia Cristina Diaconu5,6,7
1Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Insights
A restrictive left ventricle diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) significantly increases early and medium-term mortality after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation. This diastolic dysfunction is a more reliable prognostic indicator than left ventricle systolic performance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) causes significant left ventricle (LV) remodeling.
- Assessing LV performance is crucial for predicting outcomes in AR patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of LV diastolic filling patterns (LVDFP) versus LV systolic performance in severe AR patients undergoing AVR.
- To identify independent echocardiographic predictors of early and long-term prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 332 severe AR patients undergoing AVR.
- Patients were categorized by LV systolic function (normal vs. dysfunction) and LVDFP (nonrestrictive vs. restrictive).
- Echocardiographic parameters including E/A ratio, E wave deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time, and pulmonary vein flow S/D ratio were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Restrictive LVDFP was associated with significantly higher early postoperative mortality (11.12-12.5%) compared to nonrestrictive LVDFP (2.32-7.63%), irrespective of LVEF.
- Restrictive LVDFP independently predicted early mortality (RR 8.2-fold).
- Other early predictors included LV end-systolic diameter > 58 mm, age > 75 years, and comorbidities. Medium-term unfavorable outcomes were linked to age > 75, LV end-systolic volume > 95 cm³, restrictive LVDFP, and pulmonary hypertension.
Conclusions:
- Restrictive LVDFP is a significant independent predictor of both early and medium-term mortality in severe AR patients undergoing AVR.
- LV diastolic function is a more potent prognostic marker than LV systolic performance in this population.
- Age, LV dimensions, and comorbidities also influence postoperative outcomes.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Chronic severe aortic valve disease is associated with important changes in left ventricle (LV) performance associated with eccentric or concentric LV hypertrophy. We aimed to assess the immediate prognostic implications of the type of the LV diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) compared with LV systolic performance in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) and to define the independent echographic predictors for the immediate and long-term prognoses. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective study enrolling 332 AR patients undergoing AVR, divided into two groups: Group A—201 pts with normal LV systolic function, divided into two subgroups (A1: 129 pts with a nonrestrictive LVDFP and A2: 72 pts with restrictive LVDFP), and Group B—131 pts with LV systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction LVEF < 50%), divided into two subgroups (B1: 83 pts with a nonrestrictive LVDFP and B2: 48 pts with restrictive LVDFP). Results: The early postoperative mortality rate was higher in patients with a restrictive LVDFP (11.12% in A2 and 12.5% in B2) compared with normal LV filling (2.32% in A1 and 7.63% in B1, p < 0.0001), regardless of the LVEF. The restrictive LVDFP—defined by at least one of the following echographic parameters: an E/A > 2 with an E wave deceleration time (EDt) < 100 ms; an isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) < 60 ms; or an S/D ratio < 1 in the pulmonary vein flow—was an independent predictor for early postoperative mortality, increasing the relative risk by 8.2-fold. Other independent factors associated with early poor prognosis were an LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) > 58 mm, an age > 75 years, and the presence of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-COPD or diabetes mellitus). On a medium-term, an unfavorable evolution was associated with: an age > 75 years (RR = 8.1), an LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) > 95 cm3 (RR = 6.7), a restrictive LVDFP (RR = 9.8, p < 0.0002), and pulmonary hypertension (RR = 8.2). Conclusions: The presence of a restrictive LVDFP in patients with AR undergoing AVR is associated with both increased early and medium-term mortality rates. The LV diastolic function is a more reliable parameter for prognosis than LV systolic performance (RR 9.2 versus 2.1). Other independent predictors for increased early postoperative mortality rate were: an age > 75 years, an LVESD > 58 mm, and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, COPD), and for unfavorable evolution at 2 years postoperatively: an age > 75 years, an LVESV > 95 cm3, and severe pulmonary hypertension.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

