Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

In Situ Gas Analysis and Fire Characterization of Lithium-Ion Cells During Thermal Runaway Using an Environmental Chamber
Published on: March 31, 2023
Full-scale walk-in containerized lithium-ion battery energy storage system fire test data
Mark McKinnon1, Adam Barowy1,2, Alexandra Schraiber2
1UL's Fire Safety Research Institute, 6200 Old Dobbin Ln. Ste. 150 Columbia, MD 21045, United States.
Three installation-level lithium-ion battery energy storage system tests evaluated fire suppression effectiveness. Novec 1230 and water suppression systems showed potential in mitigating thermal runaway propagation during UL 9540A standard testing.
Area of Science:
- Battery safety engineering
- Fire science
- Energy storage systems
Background:
- Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are crucial for energy storage systems (ESS).
- Understanding thermal runaway propagation in large-scale LIB installations is vital for safety.
- Standardized testing methods like UL 9540A are essential for evaluating ESS fire safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of fire suppression systems in mitigating thermal runaway in an installation-level LIB ESS.
- To compare the performance of a Novec 1230 system against a dry pipe water suppression system.
- To gather data on thermal runaway propagation and fire dynamics within a standardized shipping container environment.
Main Methods:
- Conducted three UL 9540A compliant tests in a 20 ft ISO container with mocked-up ESS units.
- Initiated thermal runaway in a single 18650 cell within the initiating rack using a controlled heater.
- Implemented Novec 1230 and dry pipe water suppression systems in separate tests, with one baseline test without suppression.
- Utilized thermocouples, heat flux gauges, smoke detectors, and gas sensors to monitor fire progression and environmental conditions.
Main Results:
- Test 1 (baseline) demonstrated significant thermal runaway propagation without suppression.
- Test 2 (Novec 1230) showed reduced fire intensity and propagation compared to the baseline.
- Test 3 (water suppression) effectively controlled the fire and limited propagation, with measurable heat flux reduction.
- Both suppression systems demonstrated a positive impact on mitigating thermal runaway.
Conclusions:
- Active fire suppression systems are critical for managing thermal runaway events in large-scale LIB ESS.
- Novec 1230 and water suppression systems offer viable strategies for enhancing the safety of containerized ESS.
- Further research can optimize suppression system design and deployment for various ESS configurations.
More Related Videos
11:25Identification and Quantification of Decomposition Mechanisms in Lithium-Ion Batteries; Input to Heat Flow Simulation for Modeling Thermal Runaway
Published on: March 7, 2022
10:41The Effect of Charging and Discharging Lithium Iron Phosphate-graphite Cells at Different Temperatures on Degradation
Published on: July 18, 2018