Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

2.8K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
2.8K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

190
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
190
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

3.6K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
3.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.8K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.8K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

194
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
194

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zero-shot cross-lingual stance detection <i>via</i> adversarial language adaptation.

PeerJ. Computer science·2025
Same author

Check-worthy claim detection across topics for automated fact-checking.

PeerJ. Computer science·2023
Same author

Abusive language detection in youtube comments leveraging replies as conversational context.

PeerJ. Computer science·2021
Same author

Feature-based detection of automated language models: tackling GPT-2, GPT-3 and Grover.

PeerJ. Computer science·2021
Same author

A longitudinal analysis of the public perception of the opportunities and challenges of the Internet of Things.

PloS one·2018
Same journal

DARUMA: a gateway to fast and easy prediction of intrinsically disordered regions.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Alzheimer's disease detection using a quantum deep neural network with Haralick feature extraction and simulated annealing optimization.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Network anomaly detection using Deep Autoencoder and parallel Artificial Bee Colony algorithm-trained neural network.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

An anomaly detection model for multivariate time series with anomaly perception.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Retraction: A wormhole attack detection method for tactical wireless sensor networks.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of mental disorder with prioritization of its type by utilizing the bipolar complex fuzzy decision-making approach based on Schweizer-Sklar prioritized aggregation operators.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Aggregating pairwise semantic differences for few-shot claim verification.

Xia Zeng1, Arkaitz Zubiaga1

  • 1Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Peerj. Computer Science
|November 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new Semantic Embedding Element-wise Difference (SEED) method enhances few-shot claim verification by simulating class vectors from semantic differences. This approach improves accuracy in automated fact-checking, even with limited data.

Keywords:
Automated fact-checkingClaim validationClaim verificationFew-shot classificationMisinformation detectionNatural language processingVeracity classification

More Related Videos

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.1K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

512

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.1K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

512

Area of Science:

  • Natural Language Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Retrieval

Background:

  • Automated fact-checking requires verifying claims against evidence.
  • Limited labeled datasets hinder claim verification, especially in new domains.
  • Existing methods struggle with few-shot learning scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce Semantic Embedding Element-wise Difference (SEED), a novel vector-based method for few-shot claim verification.
  • Address the scarcity of labeled data in claim verification tasks.
  • Improve the performance of automated fact-checking systems.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a vector-based approach aggregating pairwise semantic differences for claim-evidence pairs.
  • Proposed simulating class representative vectors capturing average semantic differences.
  • Compared SEED against fine-tuned BERT/RoBERTa models and a language model perplexity method.

Main Results:

  • SEED demonstrated consistent improvements over competitive baselines in few-shot settings.
  • Achieved superior performance on the FEVER and SCIFACT datasets.
  • The proposed method effectively handles limited labeled data.

Conclusions:

  • SEED offers a robust solution for few-shot claim verification.
  • The method shows promise for enhancing automated fact-checking pipelines.
  • Availability of code facilitates further research and application.