Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Published on: March 24, 2023
Country-specific reference values for PROMIS® pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US
Caroline B Terwee1,2, Leo D Roorda3
1Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch reference values for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures were calculated. Findings suggest the need for country-specific values to ensure accurate interpretation of PROMIS scores globally.
Area of Science:
- Health Measurement
- Psychometrics
- Cross-cultural Adaptation
Background:
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is widely used for assessing patient outcomes across various medical conditions.
- Standardized interpretation of PROMIS scores is crucial for international research and clinical practice.
- Existing US reference values may not be directly applicable to other populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To calculate Dutch reference values for key PROMIS measures: Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA).
- To compare these Dutch reference values with existing US reference values.
- To inform the development of country-specific reference values for PROMIS.
Main Methods:
- A Dutch panel completed full PROMIS item banks for PF, PI, PB, APSRA, and SSRA.
- Participants reported their health status per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations).
- T-scores were calculated, and distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for severity were determined.
Main Results:
- Mean T-scores for Dutch participants were comparable to US values for PROMIS-PF (49.8 vs 50) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6 vs 50).
- Deviations were observed for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5 vs 50), PROMIS-PI (54.9 vs 50), and PROMIS-PB (52.0 vs 50).
- While thresholds for severity were similar, Dutch participants perceived limitations at lower score levels than suggested by US cut-offs.
Conclusions:
- Dutch reference values for some PROMIS domains differ from US values, highlighting the need for country-specific norms.
- Implementing country-specific reference values is recommended to enhance the global utility of PROMIS.
- Further research is required to establish reliable and patient-centered cut-off values for score interpretation.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
09:00Author Spotlight: Quantifying Pain Experience – An Illustrative Approach Using the Pain Body Diagram
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure