Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2017
Kinetic parameter estimation of hepatocellular carcinoma on 18 F-FDG PET/CT based on Bayesian method
Jianfeng He1, Yongjin Li1, Tao Wang1
1Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Background:
Dynamic PET/CT combined with a dual-input three-compartment model can be applied to assess the kinetic parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The nonlinear least squares (NLLS) method is the most common method for fitting model parameters; however, some limitations remain.
Purpose:
A novel Bayesian-based method was compared with the NLLS method to estimate the kinetic parameters for differentiating HCCs from background liver tissue.
Methods:
The proposed Bayesian method combined a priori knowledge of the physiological range and likelihood functions of HCC lesions to obtain HCC PET/CT measurements. Metropolis-Hastings sampling was used to numerically estimate the posterior distribution. This study used 5-minute dynamic PET imaging and 1-minute static PET imaging acquired 60 min post-injection from 19 HCC lesions and 17 background liver regions.
Results:
The NLLS method indicated that k3 (p = 0.001) and fa (p < 0.001) were higher in HCCs than in background liver tissue, while K1 (p = 0.603), k2 (p = 0.405), k4 (p = 0.492), Vb (p = 0.112), and Ki (p = 0.091) were not significantly different. The Bayesian method showed that k3 (p < 0.001), fa (p < 0.001), and Ki (p = 0.002) were higher in HCCs than in background liver tissue, while K1 (p = 0.195), k2 (p = 0.028), k4 (p = 0.723), and Vb (p = 0.018) were not significantly different. For k3 and fa, the Bayesian method showed a higher AUC value for diagnostic performance in differentiating HCCs from background liver tissue than the NLLS method (0.853 vs. 0.745 and 0.928 vs. 0.886). Additionally, the Bayesian method had smaller Akaike information criteria and residual sum of squares values, as well as fewer parameter estimation outliers, than the NLLS method.
Conclusions:
The proposed Bayesian method can accurately and robustly estimate liver kinetic parameters, effectively distinguish between lesions and background liver tissue, and provide accurate information about the uncertainty in parameter estimation.
More Related Videos
07:47Non-Invasive PET/MR Imaging in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: August 31, 2022
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018