Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Delays to Surgery in Emergency Department Cases of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Quality Improvement Study
Amanda Poxon1, Lauren Clarfield2, Rebecca Cherniak2
1Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Objective:
Create a process map for emergency department (ED) presentations of surgical ectopic pregnancy, and identify areas of management amenable to quality improvement.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgical management of ectopic pregnancy at a large, urban, academic tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2017 was performed.
Results:
Seventy-three patients were included. There were 6 (8.2%) unstable A cases (recommended time to operating room [OR] 0-2 hours), 23 (31.5%) stable A cases, and 44 (60%) B cases (recommended time to OR 2-8 hours). The percent of patients who were in the OR within the recommended time window were 6 (100%) for unstable A cases, 13 (56%) stable A cases, and 29 (65.9%) stable B cases, respectively (P = 0.139). Notable time delays include the time from gynaecology referral to the time seen by gynaecology (29.7% of total wait time for stable A cases from ED to OR) and the time the OR was booked to the time the patient was brought to the OR (53.2% of total wait time for stable B cases). Of the patients seen by physician at the emergency department first, the time from triage to the OR was significantly shorter for patients that received bedside ultrasound only (0.67 ± 0.5 hours vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 hours [P = 0.007]).
Conclusion:
This is the first study to map the ED presentation of surgical ectopic pregnancy. The management of ectopic pregnancy would benefit from the development of surgical triage decision aids, a surgical care pathway, and increased use of screening bedside ultrasound.

