Clinical application of artificial intelligence in longitudinal image analysis of bone age among GHD patients
Lina Zhang1, Jia Chen2, Lele Hou1
1Department of Pediatrics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Objective:
This study aims to explore the clinical value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted bone age assessment (BAA) among children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).
Methods:
A total of 290 bone age (BA) radiographs were collected from 52 children who participated in the study at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between January 2016 and August 2017. Senior pediatric endocrinologists independently evaluated BA according to the China 05 (CH05) method, and their consistent results were regarded as the gold standard (GS). Meanwhile, two junior pediatric endocrinologists were asked to assessed BA both with and without assistance from the AI-based BA evaluation system. Six months later, around 20% of the images assessed by the junior pediatric endocrinologists were randomly selected to be re-evaluated with the same procedure half a year later. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), accuracy, and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare differences in BA. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and one-way repeated ANOVA were used to assess inter- and intra-observer variabilities in BAA. A boxplot of BA evaluated by different raters during the course of treatment and a mixed linear model were used to illustrate inter-rater effect over time.
Results:
A total of 52 children with GHD were included, with mean chronological age and BA by GS of 6.64 ± 2.49 and 5.85 ± 2.30 years at baseline, respectively. After incorporating AI assistance, the performance of the junior pediatric endocrinologists improved (P < 0.001), with MAE and RMSE both decreased by more than 1.65 years (Rater 1: ΔMAE = 1.780, ΔRMSE = 1.655; Rater 2: ΔMAE = 1.794, ΔRMSE = 1.719), and accuracy increasing from approximately 10% to over 91%. The ICC also increased from 0.951 to 0.990. During GHD treatment (at baseline, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months), the difference decreased sharply when AI was applied. Furthermore, a significant inter-rater effect (P = 0.002) also vanished upon AI involvement.
Conclusion:
AI-assisted interpretation of BA can improve accuracy and decrease variability in results among junior pediatric endocrinologists in longitudinal cohort studies, which shows potential for further clinical application.
