Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
15.5K
Using a social discounting task to measure differential personal information sharing
Jacob Battaglia1, Paul Romanowich1
1Psychology Department, Gonzaga University.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|November 28, 2022
Summary
Individuals share health information more readily than other personal data, according to a social discounting study. This finding is crucial for understanding online scams like phishing.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cybersecurity
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Previous research indicates personal information is shared similarly to money.
- Online scams, such as phishing, exploit the sharing of personal information.
- No prior studies have quantified differences in sharing across various personal information types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differential sharing rates for four types of personal information: identification, financial, health, and security.
- To assess the utility of a modified social discounting task for measuring personal information sharing behavior.
Main Methods:
- A between-participant experiment was conducted with 100 college-aged participants.
- A modified social discounting task was employed to measure willingness to share different forms of personal information.
- Discounting rates for identification, financial, health, and security information were compared.
Main Results:
- Participants exhibited a significantly higher discounting rate for health information compared to identification, financial, and security information.
- This suggests health information is shared more readily than other types.
- No significant differences in discounting rates were found among identification, financial, and security information.
Conclusions:
- The social discounting task is a valid method for assessing differential personal information sharing.
- Health information appears to be shared more willingly, potentially increasing vulnerability to targeted scams.
- Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind this differential sharing and its implications for phishing susceptibility.
Related Concept Videos
Deindividuation
26.6K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.6K
Social Proof
27.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.3K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.5K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.5K
Social Exchange Theory
34.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.4K

