Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Implementing guidelines for risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis among gynecologic oncology patients: A quality
Julia R Salinaro1, Nicole Zanolli2, Tracy Truong3
1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Objective(S):
Risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis is recommended for oncology patients with a Khorana risk score (KS) ≥ 2 receiving cancer-directed therapy. We describe a quality improvement (QI) initiative designed to increase adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines for patients with gynecologic malignancies initiating outpatient treatment.
Methods:
Provider awareness and documentation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis eligibility were identified as key QI drivers. Starting May 2021, a KS calculator and thromboprophylaxis algorithm were incorporated into outpatient documentation templates. Patients with gynecologic malignancies initiating outpatient therapy from January - December 2021 were eligible. The primary process measure was the percentage of patients with KS eligibility documented each month during the baseline (Jan - Apr) versus implementation (May - Dec) periods. Rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis initiation and incidence of VTE served as outcome measures. Incidence of adverse bleeding events served as the balancing measure.
Results:
337 patients accounted for the initiation of 383 treatment regimens, including 128 in the baseline period and 255 in the implementation period. KS documentation increased significantly between the baseline and implementation periods (7% vs 62.4%, p < 0.001). 73 of the 177 eligible patients (46.2%; 166 unique patients) had appropriate documentation; of these, 57 initiated thromboprophylaxis. There was no difference in VTE rates or adverse bleeding events between eligible patients who initiated thromboprophylaxis compared with those who did not (12.3% vs 15.6%; p = 0.65 and 7.0% vs 8.2%; p = 1.0, respectively).
Conclusion(S):
This QI initiative resulted in greater adherence to risk-stratified thromboprophylaxis guidelines. No bleeding signals were identified. Studies addressing cost, medication adherence, and long-term outcomes are necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

