Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Polarization and Characterization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages on Implant Surfaces
Published on: December 6, 2024
Do Titanium Dioxide Particles Stimulate Macrophages to Release Proinflammatory Cytokines and Increase the Risk for
Carolin Stolzer1, Matthias Müller2, Martin Gosau3
1Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Purpose:
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles detached from titanium dental implants by tribocorrosion can be phagocytosed by macrophages, releasing various proinflammatory cytokines at the implant sites that may trigger peri-implantitis. The study objective was to measure the association between peri-implantitis and the presence of non-allergy-related proinflammatory cytokines associated with TiO2 particles.
Methods:
The investigators implemented a retrospective cross-sectional study and enrolled a sample of 60 subjects from a dental practice. Subjects were excluded if the plaque index was grade 3 (Silness and Löe). The predictor variable was a positive or negative TiO2 stimulation test, an in vitro macrophage proinflammatory response test. The outcome variable was peri-implantitis status defined as present or absent. Three groups were considered: control group with 20 patients without dental implants (group 1), 2 groups of patients with titanium dental implants, one without peri-implantitis (group 2), and the other with peri-implantitis (group 3) (n = 20 each). For patients with implants, depth of the gingival pockets of the implants were measured, and existing bleeding and suppuration were determined to assess peri-implantitis. Radiographs were taken if one or more factors applied to confirm the diagnosis of peri-implantitis. Further covariates were age, sex, duration of implant wear, and number of implants which were analyzed descriptively. Inferential analyses were undertaken using χ2 test, Kruskal-Wallis-, Wilcoxon-two-sample tests, and logistic regressions.
Results:
The sample was composed of 35 female and 25 male patients with a mean age of 54.2 years (standard deviation = 14.76). The overall TiO2 stimulation test positivity frequency was 28.3% and were 30.0%, 5.0%, and 50.0% in the control, implants without peri-implantitis, and implants with peri-implantitis groups. No statistically significant differences could be seen in the frequencies of the TiO2 stimulation test results between control group and combined groups 2 and 3 (P-value = .84). The risk for positive TiO2 patients with a titanium implant of developing peri-implantitis was statistically significant and higher compared to negative TiO2 patients (odds ratio, 19.0 with 95% confidence interval [2.12,170.38]; P-value< .01).
Conclusions:
The data in this study showed a statistically significant relationship between a positive TiO2 stimulation test and peri-implantitis. Further studies with larger numbers of subjects are recommended to confirm this result.

