Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.2K
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology01:59

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

19.6K
Crop cultivation has a long history in human civilization, with records showing the cultivation of cereal plants beginning at around 8000 BC. This early plant breeding was developed primarily to provide a steady supply of food.
19.6K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

6.6K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
6.6K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

41.3K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
41.3K
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

5.1K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.1K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

230.7K
Overview
230.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suitability and effectiveness of marker-assisted selection in soybeans under Asian soybean rust pressure.

Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement·2026
Same author

Selection of four mutant alleles of fatty acid desaturase genes for a stable high oleic and low linolenic acid soybean seed oil trait.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2026
Same author

Contrasting Selection on GxE and Main Effect Loci for Soybean Grain Yield.

Genetics·2026
Same author

Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.

The plant genome·2026
Same author

Genomic selection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne enterolobii) resistance in watermelon wild relatives (Citrullus amarus).

The plant genome·2026
Same author

Impact of environmental covariates summarization on predictive ability in genomic selection.

The plant genome·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
09:43

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits

Published on: January 3, 2025

2.5K

Genomic selection performs as effectively as phenotypic selection for increasing seed yield in soybean.

Nonoy B Bandillo1,2, Diego Jarquin1,3, Luis G Posadas1

  • 1Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, 363 Keim Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.

The Plant Genome
|November 30, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Genomic selection (GS) effectively accelerates genetic gain in soybean seed yield, matching phenotypic selection (PS) performance. While GS offers advantages, consider measures to preserve genetic diversity during its implementation.

More Related Videos

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.6K
A Simple Method for Isolation of Soybean Protoplasts and Application to Transient Gene Expression Analyses
09:22

A Simple Method for Isolation of Soybean Protoplasts and Application to Transient Gene Expression Analyses

Published on: January 25, 2018

25.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
09:43

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits

Published on: January 3, 2025

2.5K
Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.6K
A Simple Method for Isolation of Soybean Protoplasts and Application to Transient Gene Expression Analyses
09:22

A Simple Method for Isolation of Soybean Protoplasts and Application to Transient Gene Expression Analyses

Published on: January 25, 2018

25.1K

Area of Science:

  • Plant breeding
  • Genetics
  • Agricultural science

Background:

  • Increasing genetic gain for soybean seed yield is a primary objective in breeding programs.
  • Genomic selection (GS) shows potential for accelerating genetic gain in soybean.
  • Limited studies have validated GS accuracy and compared it with phenotypic selection (PS) in soybean.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically validate genomic selection (GS) for increasing soybean seed yield.
  • To compare the effectiveness of GS against phenotypic selection (PS) and random selection (RS).
  • To assess GS prediction accuracy in diverse validation sets within a real-world breeding program.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized over 1,500 soybean lines and 7 years of replicated experimental data (2010-2016).
  • Trained the genomic selection model on a large population and validated it on three distinct sets: two biparental populations and one advanced line population.
  • Compared prediction accuracy from validation experiments with cross-validation results.

Main Results:

  • Realized prediction accuracy in validation experiments (.54) was comparable to cross-validation accuracy (.64).
  • Both GS and PS improved population mean performance over random selection (RS).
  • GS demonstrated a selection advantage over PS, maximizing genetic gain and top-line identification at 10-20% selection intensity.
  • GS resulted in minor increases in genetic similarity compared to PS and RS, potentially shifting allelic frequencies.

Conclusions:

  • Genomic selection (GS) can be as effective as phenotypic selection (PS) for improving soybean seed yield.
  • GS may accelerate genetic gain and identify superior lines more efficiently.
  • Consideration must be given to potential erosion of genetic diversity when implementing GS, necessitating protective measures.