Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

On semi-supervised estimation using exponential tilt mixture models.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2025

Same author

Sensitivity models and bounds under sequential unmeasured confounding in longitudinal studies.

Biometrika·2025

Same author

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2024

Same author

Consistent and robust inference in hazard probability and odds models with discrete-time survival data.

Lifetime data analysis·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

Discussion on "Instrumented difference-in-differences" by Ye, Ertefaie, Flory, Hennessy, Small.

¹Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

|November 30, 2022

Summary

This study compares the instrumented difference-in-differences (DID) method with instrumental variable (IV) approaches. It offers new insights into handling unmeasured confounding in causal inference research.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Econometrics
Causal Inference
Epidemiology

Background:

Unmeasured confounding poses a significant challenge in establishing causal relationships.
Traditional methods like instrumental variable (IV) and difference-in-differences (DID) have limitations in addressing unmeasured confounding.
The instrumented difference-in-differences (YEFHS) method offers a novel approach to this problem.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically compare the assumptions and identification strategies of IV, DID, and the YEFHS method.
To derive novel identification results for causal inference under unmeasured confounding.
To explore covariate adjustment strategies within the YEFHS framework.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of causal inference methodologies.
Theoretical derivation of identification conditions.
Exploration of extensions for covariate adjustment.

Main Results:

The study clarifies the relationships between IV, DID, and YEFHS assumptions.
New identification results are presented, enhancing the YEFHS framework.
Guidance is provided on incorporating covariates into the YEFHS method.

Conclusions:

The YEFHS method provides a valuable alternative for addressing unmeasured confounding.
Understanding the connections between IV, DID, and YEFHS aids in selecting appropriate causal inference tools.
Further research can build upon these identification results for robust causal effect estimation.